-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
ExecutionResult wrapping can be avoided - reduces memory allocations and GC #3330
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2409c1a
A POC to show how ExecutionResult wrapping could be avoided
bbakerman 2ec535d
A POC to show how ExecutionResult wrapping could be avoided -fix for …
bbakerman e7a5582
A POC to show how ExecutionResult wrapping could be avoided - fixed m…
bbakerman 8ec6cea
A POC to show how ExecutionResult wrapping could be avoided - fixed m…
bbakerman b16deb4
A POC to show how ExecutionResult wrapping could be avoided - javadoc…
bbakerman 25dfe4b
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into stop_allocating_exe…
bbakerman f515d89
Updated field level approach
bbakerman 143d089
Fixed up @DeprecatedAT
bbakerman ccfaaf4
Fix up abort exception so its now an error
bbakerman File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -42,35 +42,24 @@ public CompletableFuture<ExecutionResult> execute(ExecutionContext executionCont | |
|
|
||
| ExecutionStrategyInstrumentationContext executionStrategyCtx = ExecutionStrategyInstrumentationContext.nonNullCtx(instrumentation.beginExecutionStrategy(instrumentationParameters, executionContext.getInstrumentationState())); | ||
|
|
||
| MergedSelectionSet fields = parameters.getFields(); | ||
| List<String> fieldNames = fields.getKeys(); | ||
| Async.CombinedBuilder<FieldValueInfo> futures = Async.ofExpectedSize(fields.size()); | ||
| for (String fieldName : fieldNames) { | ||
| MergedField currentField = fields.getSubField(fieldName); | ||
|
|
||
| ResultPath fieldPath = parameters.getPath().segment(mkNameForPath(currentField)); | ||
| ExecutionStrategyParameters newParameters = parameters | ||
| .transform(builder -> builder.field(currentField).path(fieldPath).parent(parameters)); | ||
|
|
||
| CompletableFuture<FieldValueInfo> future = resolveFieldWithInfo(executionContext, newParameters); | ||
| futures.add(future); | ||
| } | ||
| List<String> fieldNames = parameters.getFields().getKeys(); | ||
|
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. the above is moved into the |
||
| Async.CombinedBuilder<FieldValueInfo> futures = getAsyncFieldValueInfo(executionContext, parameters); | ||
| CompletableFuture<ExecutionResult> overallResult = new CompletableFuture<>(); | ||
| executionStrategyCtx.onDispatched(overallResult); | ||
|
|
||
| futures.await().whenComplete((completeValueInfos, throwable) -> { | ||
| BiConsumer<List<ExecutionResult>, Throwable> handleResultsConsumer = handleResults(executionContext, fieldNames, overallResult); | ||
| BiConsumer<List<Object>, Throwable> handleResultsConsumer = handleResults(executionContext, fieldNames, overallResult); | ||
| if (throwable != null) { | ||
| handleResultsConsumer.accept(null, throwable.getCause()); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| Async.CombinedBuilder<ExecutionResult> executionResultFutures = Async.ofExpectedSize(completeValueInfos.size()); | ||
| Async.CombinedBuilder<Object> fieldValuesFutures = Async.ofExpectedSize(completeValueInfos.size()); | ||
| for (FieldValueInfo completeValueInfo : completeValueInfos) { | ||
| executionResultFutures.add(completeValueInfo.getFieldValue()); | ||
| fieldValuesFutures.add(completeValueInfo.getFieldValueFuture()); | ||
| } | ||
| executionStrategyCtx.onFieldValuesInfo(completeValueInfos); | ||
| executionResultFutures.await().whenComplete(handleResultsConsumer); | ||
| fieldValuesFutures.await().whenComplete(handleResultsConsumer); | ||
| }).exceptionally((ex) -> { | ||
| // if there are any issues with combining/handling the field results, | ||
| // complete the future at all costs and bubble up any thrown exception so | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The above is a breaking change IF we consider the ExecutionStrategy API - which I argue we should re-consider