Chat with agents
Talk through strategy and it fans out into tasks. Chat proposes the work and waits for your go-ahead — it never runs the task itself.
Hand your backlog to agents. Keep the final say.
You already run Codex or Claude Code by hand, one terminal at a time. Task Machine turns them into teammates that pick up tickets, open changes for review, and wait for your approval before anything merges.
0:00
0:00
Private beta. We invite teams in batches and never share your email.
Works with
Codex
Claude Code
Opencode
Pi
OpenClaw
Hermes Agent
Set the work up once, and it keeps getting done
Hand off a recurring job once, then direct, review, and steer it across three surfaces that share one set of tasks.
Review in inbox
Every approval, question, and finished result lands here. Approve or reject in a click and stay in control.
Steer in tasks
Open any task to read its history, see the plan, and steer an agent the moment the work needs a hand.
See how one workflow runs, end to end
Here is one example, start to finish: shipping the next feature off your backlog. Task Machine handles any recurring engineering work the same way — the same deterministic workflow, the same steps, every cycle.
You hand off the work
You hand Task Machine the next feature off the backlog: implement it from the ticket, add the tests, open a pull request for review, and keep the rest of the backlog moving.
Brief it once, it runs on every cycle.
Works with
Task Machine turns it into a deterministic workflow
Task Machine turns your brief into a deterministic workflow — implement the feature from the ticket, add the tests, and let a verifier run the full suite before it opens a pull request. The same ordered steps every time, pausing only where a step needs your call.
The same deterministic workflow, every time.
Task Machine knows the blast radius of every step
Before it acts, Task Machine weighs how far each step reaches. A branch waiting in review changes nothing you can't undo; merging into your codebase does. It handles the low-stakes work itself and only brings you the changes that genuinely carry weight, so you are never pulled in without a reason.
Low-stakes steps never reach you.
Every critical decision waits for your approval
The pull requests that need your eyes wait in one place for your yes or no, each with the plan and the test results attached. Approve or reject, and the workflow carries on — every routine change already opened its own review. Nothing merges without you.
You only receive what needs your attention.
Task Machine stays inside the budget you set
You set a spending cap, and the workflow works inside it, tracking every cost against your limit as it runs. It pauses to ask before it would ever cross that line, so the spend is something you decide up front, not something you discover on a bill.
You always stay in control of your budget.
Task Machine earns autonomy as it proves itself
Every approval you give is evidence. Once Task Machine has your review calls right often enough, it asks to merge the low-risk changes on its own — and you grant or hold that step up from your inbox. Independence is earned on a track record, never assumed.
You approve less as it earns your trust.
When it hits a wall, it asks for the right hire
Partway through, the features kept needing a first-pass review no agent was set up to run. Rather than guess, Task Machine proposed a dedicated code-review agent to own it — yours to approve or decline. It grows its own team, on your say-so.
It proposes the hire, you approve it.
Task Machine works from what your company already knows
Its changes come from one shared knowledge base — your architecture notes, past pull requests, each project's conventions — the same source your team and every agent work from, not guesses.
One shared source of truth for every agent and teammate.
You stay in charge as it grows
You approve the changes that matter while your agents implement and test the routine ones — and they take on more as they earn it. A team of you and your agents, not a company of bots you rubber-stamp from above.
You sign off. The agents do the rest.
Works with your tools
Agents act in the services you already run — every connector is a real integration your agents act through.
-
Slack
-
GitHub
-
Notion
-
Linear
-
Jira
-
Asana
-
Trello
-
monday.com
-
ClickUp
-
Stripe
-
-
Salesforce
-
Figma
-
Shopify
-
Zendesk
-
Intercom
-
Sentry
-
Vercel
-
Supabase
-
Mailchimp
-
Gmail
-
Calendly
-
Zoom
-
-
Hugging Face
-
OpenAI
-
Canva
-
Mixpanel
-
PostHog
-
Cloudflare
Common questions
Which coding workers does it support?
Codex, Claude Code, Opencode, Pi, OpenClaw, and Hermes Agent, using the account you already pay for. Workers run on machines you connect, and every run leaves a history you can read.
Does anything merge without my approval?
Only where you allow it. The default routes every change to your inbox for review, and you raise an agent's autonomy where its work has proven itself, with budgets and checks in force at every level.
Where does the code run?
On your own machines, against the repositories and accounts you own. Task Machine coordinates the work and keeps the history; it never custodies your code or credentials.
Does it replace my issue tracker or CI?
No. It plugs into the tools you already run. Outside systems can file tasks into a project, and your existing checks keep gating what ships.
Don't see your workflow? Describe it.
A sentence or two about a recurring job is enough. We design the playbook that runs it and show you exactly what it saves.
Put your backlog on rails
Join the waitlist and we will send early access when the first private beta spots open.
Private beta. We invite teams in batches and never share your email.