fix: typo unmarshalling#2069
Conversation
Kusari Analysis Results:
No pinned version dependency changes, code issues or exposed secrets detected! Note View full detailed analysis result for more information on the output and the checks that were run.
Found this helpful? Give it a 👍 or 👎 reaction! |
|
Kusari PR Analysis rerun based on - 5af7c10 performed at: 2025-08-29T13:39:10Z - link to updated analysis |
|
Wow. Good catch 👍 |
|
Any comments? |
|
Kusari PR Analysis rerun based on - 970c583 performed at: 2025-09-13T19:18:26Z - link to updated analysis |
|
Kusari PR Analysis rerun based on - 2ffe9cb performed at: 2025-09-24T19:14:50Z - link to updated analysis |
|
Kusari PR Analysis rerun based on - 89a67a5 performed at: 2025-09-27T19:11:34Z - link to updated analysis |
|
Hi, I wanted to follow up on this PR which has been open for about a month. I've noticed there's been recent activity in the project with other PRs being merged, so I'm wondering what the next steps might be for this one. I am happy to make any necessary changes or provide additional context if that would help. If this isn't a priority right now or doesn't fit with the project's direction, I'd appreciate knowing that too—I'd rather have clear feedback than leave it open indefinitely. Thanks! |
This project is maintained by very busy folks who are probably going to want to pour through the changes manually, especially with the rise of AI attackings, so it's going to take some time. I'm not sure of any way to expedite the process; however, if you can think of one, please let me/us know :) Personal plug: #2070 wink+nudge |
Hi @chaseisabelle! Thanks for your answer. I completely understand that maintainers are busy. My main goal is just to clarify the status. At this point, I'd just like to know if:
If it's the latter, I'm totally fine with that—I'd just prefer to know so I can close the PR and don't need to invest time in keeping the branch updated. Thanks again for your time! |
|
Thanks for the contribution! To clarify:
It's the former. If it were the latter, I'd have dropped a comment / closed the PR accordingly Please be patient - we've got quite a few other higher-priority PRs, and will get to this at some point!
No worries about keeping it updated, I'll get it updated when I get round to it :) Related: #1909 (comment) |
I found some typos:
unmarshaling->unmarshalling.specificiation->specification