Abstract
I end with the idea that changes in public messaging coupled with modest modifications in our land management goals could produce a win-win situation with respect to conservation, commodity production, and human safety. We must abandon the currently popular good fire/bad fire message, where low-severity fire is seen as “good” and high-severity fire as “bad” for a conifer forest system. Climate-related changes in fire behavior cannot be used as a new justification for the expansion of timber harvesting and prescribed burning in western mixed-conifer forests; that approach will not address the climate crisis, and it will act against the creation and maintenance of the special burned forest conditions I have described.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only

