CMake support#172
Conversation
|
@omaralvarez, thank you for the quick response! I just noticed that |
|
It has to do with CMake, I will try to find a solution. But the standard way of doing header only in CMake is that one. I can fix the examples, sorry for not noticing. I'll write here with whatever I find. |
|
@omaralvarez, here is another example (Chromium Crashpad) that depends on the structure in addition to my personal projects. As you can see, once |
|
Everything is ready, I don't know why the appveyor test failed. Right now the file hierarchy is the same as before, so nothing should break. |
|
@omaralvarez, thanks for the update. I kicked the AppVeyor test again, and it succeeded this time. Thanks for your great contribution! |
|
@yhirose No problem, thanks to you for this awesome library! |
CMake support
Added modern CMake support to have a standard way of using the library.