PISA is a survey of students' skills and knowledge as they approach the end of compulsory education. It focuses on examining how well prepared the students are for life beyond school.
Around 510,000 students in 65 economies took part in the PISA 2012 assessment of reading, mathematics and science representing about 28 million 15-year-olds globally. Of those economies, 44 took part in an assessment of creative problem solving and 18 in an assessment of financial literacy.
'pisa2012.csv' file is the original dataset. It was not attached in this project because the file was too large that it exceeded Github.s limit. 'pisadict2012.csv' file is the dictionary for the original 'pisa2012.csv' dataset.. 'PISA Analysis .ipynb' is the Jupyter Notebook with both the exploratory and explanatory data analyses. The .html file is also included 'PISA Analysis.html'
Before starting this study, I thought the features that would affect the total scores the most were the teachers' influences, the students' immigration status, the class size, and the parents' highest schooling. However, almost none of my assumptions were correct once I started to see the relationships of the variables with the total scores and with other variables.
The number of cellphones, TVs, computers & books, the parents' schooling & jobs, and the homework study time were the variables that affected the total scores.
The higher the number of cellphones, TVs, computers and books, the higher the chances of getting a better total score. This could be because the family's social status was better, and therefore provided better support for the students.
As long as the parents' schooling was level 3A or higher, there is a good chance that the students would get higher grades. Furthermore, parents who had full-time jobs resulted in their children getting higher scores. This could be because having role models to look up to will make you work harder and believe in yourself more.
Finally, students who studied for longer hours had a higher chance of scoring better.