Skip to content

chore: add changesets foundation config#381

Open
meganetaaan wants to merge 2 commits intodev/v1.0from
ops/add-changesets-foundation
Open

chore: add changesets foundation config#381
meganetaaan wants to merge 2 commits intodev/v1.0from
ops/add-changesets-foundation

Conversation

@meganetaaan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@meganetaaan meganetaaan commented Mar 27, 2026

Adds repository-level Changesets configuration as non-invasive release-note scaffolding anchored to dev/v1.0.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Repository prepared for automated changelog and release management workflows.
    • Release tooling configured (changelog generation enabled, base branch set to dev/v1.0, internal dependency updates set to patch) while preserving existing firmware and web workflows and keeping automatic commit behavior disabled.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 27, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0ce40539-7af6-4cc6-a698-35b0e928934b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5dbf437 and ffe6390.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .changeset/config.json
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .changeset/config.json

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a new .changeset directory with a README describing its purpose and current tracking scope (dev/v1.0), and a config.json that configures Changesets behavior for future changelog/release-note automation.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
.changeset Directory
.changeset/README.md, .changeset/config.json
Introduces Changesets foundation: README documents intent and current base branch (dev/v1.0) and notes not to change existing firmware/web package workflows; config.json sets changelog generator, commit: false, access: restricted, baseBranch: "dev/v1.0", internal: "patch", and empty linked/ignore arrays.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 In a cozy dot-folder, I hop and I write,
Tiny configs aligned, ready for flight,
dev/v1.0 is the path that I trace,
Quietly prepping release-note space,
Hooray for tidy changelogs—hop to it! 🌱

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'chore: add changesets foundation config' accurately describes the main change—adding Changesets configuration files for release automation foundation.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch ops/add-changesets-foundation

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.changeset/config.json (1)

6-6: When release automation is implemented, align the access setting with your publishing strategy.

The changeset configuration is currently a placeholder for future release automation. When you implement publishing for stackchan-web (an unscoped package), update "access" to "public" rather than "restricted", as "restricted" is intended for scoped packages only.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In @.changeset/config.json at line 6, The changeset config currently sets
"access" to "restricted", which is only appropriate for scoped packages; when
you implement release automation and intend to publish the unscoped package
"stackchan-web", change the "access" value in .changeset/config.json from
"restricted" to "public" so the publishing strategy matches the package scope
and avoids access-related publish failures.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In @.changeset/config.json:
- Line 2: Update the JSON schema URL value for the "$schema" key to reference
the latest Changesets config schema version: replace
"https://unpkg.com/@changesets/[email protected]/schema.json" with
"https://unpkg.com/@changesets/[email protected]/schema.json" so the config uses the
3.1.3 schema; modify the string value associated with the "$schema" property in
the file accordingly.

---

Nitpick comments:
In @.changeset/config.json:
- Line 6: The changeset config currently sets "access" to "restricted", which is
only appropriate for scoped packages; when you implement release automation and
intend to publish the unscoped package "stackchan-web", change the "access"
value in .changeset/config.json from "restricted" to "public" so the publishing
strategy matches the package scope and avoids access-related publish failures.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a44c221e-7266-4ea6-91c4-1ae8776b3806

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 20a4b1b and 5dbf437.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .changeset/README.md
  • .changeset/config.json

Comment thread .changeset/config.json Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant