Adding optional rate limit support.#249
Merged
thinkingserious merged 4 commits intomasterfrom Dec 21, 2017
Merged
Conversation
thinkingserious
added
the
status: code review request
Contributor
Author
|
@thinkingserious @mbernier If this pattern is acceptable, I'll begin porting it to the other libraries. |
Contributor
|
Oh man this is cool. @thinkingserious what was the process in the other lib? Was it sendgrid-csharp that built this in? |
Contributor
Author
Contributor
|
In C#: sendgrid/sendgrid-csharp#369 |
thinkingserious
added
the
status: code review request
Contributor
|
Hello @andy-trimble, |
Contributor
|
Fantastic work @andy-trimble! If you get a moment, would you mind throwing an example in here? Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added an asynchronous execution method that will retry in the event of a rate limit event.
This solves the following issue: #169