feat(ops.scan_map): adds scan_map operator#274
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
I should add that I have simply copy-pasted the scan implementation and modified a few things, which seemed like a reasonable thing to do. |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #274 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 82.79% 82.84% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 83 84 +1
Lines 11887 12196 +309
==========================================
+ Hits 9842 10104 +262
- Misses 2045 2092 +47 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
wjian23
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2026
Contributor
Author
|
🙏 ✨ |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey, I needed this because the
Clonebound onscanwas too restrictive.And I did not need to emit the accumulated value at all.
So, this seems to do the trick.
First time contribution. Must have done something dumb. Please don't yell at me.