⚡️ Speed up function replace_placeholders by 10%#338
Merged
sinaatalay merged 1 commit intoFeb 8, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Certainly! Here are some changes to optimize the given Python program for better performance, focusing on minimizing redundant calls and improving efficiency wherever possible. 1. **Reduce Redundant Function Calls**: Avoid calling `get_date_input()` multiple times—the result can be stored in a variable instead. 2. **Use f-strings**: For string formatting, using f-strings is generally more efficient. 3. **Apply Placeholders Replacement Sequentially**: Making the `replace` calls sequentially to avoid re-scanning the entire string for each placeholder. Let's rewrite the code with these optimizations. ### Summary of Optimizations 1. **Redundant Calls**: Captured `get_date_input()` in the variable `date_input` to reduce redundant calls. 2. **Reuse Computations**: Calculated `name_snake_case` and `name_kebab_case` once and reused them instead of recalculating multiple times. 3. **Better Loop**: Used a tuple of tuples for `placeholders`, iterating through once and applying replacements in sequence. These changes improve the efficiency of the `replace_placeholders` function by reducing redundant calculations and I/O operations, resulting in better runtime performance.
0c768bd to
2d0e7fd
Compare
Member
|
Thank you! |
sinaatalay
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2025
**Summary of Optimizations:** 1. **Redundant Calls**: Captured `get_date_input()` in the variable `date_input` to reduce redundant calls. 2. **Reuse Computations**: Calculated `name_snake_case` and `name_kebab_case` once and reused them instead of recalculating multiple times. 3. **Better Loop**: Used a tuple of tuples for `placeholders`, iterating through once and applying replacements in sequence. These changes improve the efficiency of the `replace_placeholders` function by reducing redundant calculations and I/O operations, resulting in better runtime performance. Co-authored-by: codeflash-ai[bot] <148906541+codeflash-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
sinaatalay
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2025
**Summary of Optimizations:** 1. **Redundant Calls**: Captured `get_date_input()` in the variable `date_input` to reduce redundant calls. 2. **Reuse Computations**: Calculated `name_snake_case` and `name_kebab_case` once and reused them instead of recalculating multiple times. 3. **Better Loop**: Used a tuple of tuples for `placeholders`, iterating through once and applying replacements in sequence. These changes improve the efficiency of the `replace_placeholders` function by reducing redundant calculations and I/O operations, resulting in better runtime performance. Co-authored-by: codeflash-ai[bot] <148906541+codeflash-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
sinaatalay
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2025
**Summary of Optimizations:** 1. **Redundant Calls**: Captured `get_date_input()` in the variable `date_input` to reduce redundant calls. 2. **Reuse Computations**: Calculated `name_snake_case` and `name_kebab_case` once and reused them instead of recalculating multiple times. 3. **Better Loop**: Used a tuple of tuples for `placeholders`, iterating through once and applying replacements in sequence. These changes improve the efficiency of the `replace_placeholders` function by reducing redundant calculations and I/O operations, resulting in better runtime performance. Co-authored-by: codeflash-ai[bot] <148906541+codeflash-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 10% (0.10x) speedup for
replace_placeholdersinrendercv/data/models/computers.py⏱️ Runtime :
358 microseconds→325 microseconds(best of16runs)📝 Explanation and details
Here are some changes to optimize the given Python program for better performance, focusing on minimizing redundant calls and improving efficiency wherever possible.
get_date_input()multiple times—the result can be stored in a variable instead.replacecalls sequentially to avoid re-scanning the entire string for each placeholder.Summary of Optimizations
get_date_input()in the variabledate_inputto reduce redundant calls.name_snake_caseandname_kebab_caseonce and reused them instead of recalculating multiple times.placeholders, iterating through once and applying replacements in sequence.These changes improve the efficiency of the
replace_placeholdersfunction by reducing redundant calculations and I/O operations, resulting in better runtime performance.✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details
Created this optimization with codeflash.ai