chore: reword the remaining by-details docstring flagged by the eleventh audit - #1896
Conversation
|
Thanks for contributing! A quick note: this project is in the process of moving from LGPL-2.1 to Apache 2.0, see #1835. By continuing with this pull request you agree that this new contribution is offered under Apache 2.0. This notice does not affect your previous contributions. If you would like to consent to relicensing those as well, please post the consent statement on #1835; silence is never treated as consent for past work. If offering this contribution under Apache 2.0 does not work for you, no hard feelings; reply with the exact phrase |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1896 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.87% 99.87%
=======================================
Files 33 33
Lines 3911 3911
Branches 568 568
=======================================
Hits 3906 3906
Misses 3 3
Partials 2 2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Summary
The eleventh independent audit of the #1835 removal claims found one docstring #1892 missed:
get_by_detailsstill opened with the 2009 "Gets ... by details. Returns None ..." template (0.68 against the 2009 line). Reworded in fresh words; the caller-facing caveat sentences are untouched.Test plan
REQUIRE_CYTHON=1rebuild: 518 passed