Skip to content

Review README.md for relevance and importance #1297

Closed

Description

@gvanrossum

@emilyemorehouse If you want more ideas for editorial work, I suspect that the README.md could probably be improved for new users by reordering some things and perhaps removing some things?

Activity

  1. gvanrossum commented on May 22, 2017

    @gvanrossum
    MemberAuthor

    (Also CONTRIBUTING.md.)

  2. srittau commented on Oct 21, 2018

    @srittau
    Collaborator

    @gvanrossum Is this bug still relevant?

  3. gvanrossum commented on Oct 21, 2018

    @gvanrossum
    MemberAuthor
  4. hauntsaninja commented on Jun 11, 2020

    @hauntsaninja
    Collaborator

    CONTRIBUTING.md and README.md recently got some love as part of #4132 and #3727, and have seen many changes since this issue was opened. The current state seems reasonable to me, but happy to reopen if anyone sees things that can be improved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions