License appears to be incompatible with Python source from which it was derived #12

Activity

1. gvanrossum commented on Aug 15, 2016

   

   gvanrossum

   on Aug 15, 2016

   Member

   More actions

   What kind of incompatibility are you concerned about? The LICENSE currently has both Apache 2.0 2.0 and MIT.
2. mr-c commented on Aug 15, 2016

   

   mr-c

   on Aug 15, 2016

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   Ah, I didn't see the additional contents and just presumed it was the Apache 2.0 license only. It is unclear as to which license applies to which code paths or even eras of contributions. Perhaps a couple sentences can be added to the top?

   Bonus, you could adopt Debian's machine & human readable copyright & licensing format: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
3. gvanrossum commented on Aug 15, 2016

   

   gvanrossum

   on Aug 15, 2016

   Member

   More actions

   Can you send us a PR for that?
4. mr-c commented on Aug 17, 2016

   

   mr-c

   on Aug 17, 2016

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   Sure. Also, the LICENSE file wasn't shipped in the sdist on PyPI which is what I based the packaging off of.
5. gvanrossum commented on Aug 17, 2016

   

   gvanrossum

   on Aug 17, 2016

   Member

   More actions

   OK, since you are the first person to care about this please help us fix it!
6. mr-c commented on Aug 17, 2016

   

   mr-c

   on Aug 17, 2016

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   Ready for your review: #13
7. ddfisher commented on Aug 23, 2016

   

   ddfisher

   on Aug 23, 2016

   Collaborator

   More actions

   Fixed by #13.
8. ddfisher

   closed this as completedon Aug 23, 2016
9. tbbharaj

   added a commit that references this issue on Dec 6, 2021

   Merge pull request python#12 from darkk/master

   ...

   e70527a