Skip to content

bpo-8145: Improve isolation_level documentation#8499

Merged
zooba merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom
berkerpeksag:8145-sqlite-isolation-level
Jul 29, 2018
Merged

bpo-8145: Improve isolation_level documentation#8499
zooba merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom
berkerpeksag:8145-sqlite-isolation-level

Conversation

@berkerpeksag
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@berkerpeksag berkerpeksag commented Jul 27, 2018

Initial patch by R. David Murray.

https://bugs.python.org/issue8145

Initial patch by R. David Murray.
@miss-islington
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @berkerpeksag for the PR, and @zooba for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.6, 3.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry @berkerpeksag and @zooba, I had trouble checking out the 3.7 backport branch.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker a71fed0b7596f1c11a2fa6c1b7311157148f5f9f 3.7

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2018
Initial patch by R. David Murray.
(cherry picked from commit a71fed0)

Co-authored-by: Berker Peksag <[email protected]>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

GH-8539 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.6 branch.

@zooba
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

zooba commented Jul 29, 2018

@Mariatta - what does the error from miss-islington mean? Is this something that needs fixing on her server?

zooba pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2018
Initial patch by R. David Murray.
(cherry picked from commit a71fed0)

Co-authored-by: Berker Peksag <[email protected]>
zooba pushed a commit to zooba/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2018
@bedevere-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

GH-8543 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.

@berkerpeksag berkerpeksag deleted the 8145-sqlite-isolation-level branch July 29, 2018 09:21
zooba added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2018
@Mariatta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Seems like it was trying to do two backports at the same time in the same git repo, so the second one errored out.

Thought I had a mechanism to prevent this from happening, but will look into it again.
A workaround is to reapply the needs backport label after the first backport PR has been created.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants