Skip to content

[3.9] bpo-44135: Refine explanation of how passing tuples to issubclass() behaves (GH-26193) - #28094

Merged
ambv merged 1 commit into
python:3.9from
ambv:issubclass-clarify-39
Aug 31, 2021
Merged

ambv merged 1 commit into
python:3.9from
ambv:issubclass-clarify-39

Conversation

@ambv

@ambv ambv commented Aug 31, 2021 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is a quasi-backport to 3.9 since the wording in this branch is different.

Co-authored-by: Zachary Kneupper [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue44135

…ehaves (pythonGH-26193)

This is a quasi-backport to 3.9 since the wording in this branch is different.

Co-authored-by: Zachary Kneupper [email protected]

@Fidget-Spinner Fidget-Spinner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks for handling this semi backport Łukasz.

PS: I just noticed you properly formatted True with the double backticks here which I'd missed in the other 2 PRs, working on a small fix shortly.

@ambv
ambv merged commit 5f66ad0 into python:3.9 Aug 31, 2021
@ambv
ambv deleted the issubclass-clarify-39 branch August 31, 2021 16:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news sprint

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants