Skip to content

bpo-44135: issubclass documentation doesn't explain tuple semantic - #26193

Merged
ambv merged 1 commit into
python:mainfrom
zkneupper:bpo-44135
Aug 31, 2021
Merged

bpo-44135: issubclass documentation doesn't explain tuple semantic#26193
ambv merged 1 commit into
python:mainfrom
zkneupper:bpo-44135

Conversation

@zkneupper

@zkneupper zkneupper commented May 17, 2021 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bpo-44135: issubclass documentation doesn't explain tuple semantic

[bpo-44135](https://bugs.python.org/issue44135): issubclass documentation doesn't explain tuple semantic

https://bugs.python.org/issue44135

https://bugs.python.org/issue44135

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label May 17, 2021
@zkneupper zkneupper changed the title Address https://bugs.python.org/issue44135 bpo-44135: issubclass documentation doesn't explain tuple semantic May 17, 2021
Fidget-Spinner
Fidget-Spinner approved these changes May 17, 2021
View reviewed changes

@Fidget-Spinner Fidget-Spinner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM! Thanks for submitting this PR.

@Fidget-Spinner

Fidget-Spinner commented May 17, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

BTW, I think it would be better if your issue title summarised what the change is about. So maybe bpo-xxxxx:improve explanation of tuple semantics in issubclass docs or something like that?

@zkneupper

zkneupper commented May 17, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

BTW, I think it would be better if your issue title summarised what the change is about. So maybe bpo-xxxxx:improve explanation of tuple semantics in issubclass docs or something like that?

Thanks for the suggestion. I'll try to do a better job of naming PRs in the future. :)

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 17, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Jun 17, 2021
@Fidget-Spinner

Fidget-Spinner commented Aug 31, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sorry for the long wait Zack.

@ambv sorry can I trouble you to take a look at this please? I'd appreciate a second pair of eyes.

@ambv
ambv merged commit 08767c7 into python:main Aug 31, 2021
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Aug 31, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @zkneupper for the PR, and @ambv for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2021
@zkneupper @miss-islington
bpo-44135: Refine explanation of how passing tuples to issubclass() b…
dcc4e25 
…ehaves (pythonGH-26193)

Co-authored-by: Zachary Kneupper <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 08767c7)

Co-authored-by: Zack Kneupper <[email protected]>
@bedevere-bot

bedevere-bot commented Aug 31, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

GH-28091 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch.

miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2021
@miss-islington @zkneupper
bpo-44135: Refine explanation of how passing tuples to issubclass() b…
ab8fed8 
…ehaves (GH-26193)

Co-authored-by: Zachary Kneupper <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 08767c7)

Co-authored-by: Zack Kneupper <[email protected]>
ambv added a commit to ambv/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2021
@ambv
bpo-44135: Refine explanation of how passing tuples to issubclass() b…
42cceb9 
…ehaves (pythonGH-26193)

This is a quasi-backport to 3.9 since the wording in this branch is different.

Co-authored-by: Zachary Kneupper [email protected]
ambv added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2021
@ambv
bpo-44135: Refine explanation of how passing tuples to issubclass() b…
5f66ad0 
…ehaves (GH-26193) (GH-28094)

This is a quasi-backport to 3.9 since the wording in this branch is different.

Co-authored-by: Zachary Kneupper [email protected]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Fidget-Spinner Fidget-Spinner Fidget-Spinner approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news sprint stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@zkneupper @Fidget-Spinner @miss-islington @bedevere-bot @ambv @the-knights-who-say-ni