Skip to content

bpo-40499: Mention that asyncio.wait() needs a non-empty aws set #19900

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
gvanrossum merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2020
Merged

bpo-40499: Mention that asyncio.wait() needs a non-empty aws set #19900

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions Doc/library/asyncio-task.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -498,6 +498,8 @@ Waiting Primitives
set concurrently and block until the condition specified
by *return_when*.

The *aws* set must not be empty.

Returns two sets of Tasks/Futures: ``(done, pending)``.

Usage::
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions Misc/ACKS
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1443,6 +1443,7 @@ Mike Romberg
Armin Ronacher
Case Roole
Timothy Roscoe
Joel Rosdahl
Erik Rose
Mark Roseman
Josh Rosenberg
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions Misc/NEWS.d/next/Documentation/2020-05-04-14-20-02.bpo-40499.tjLSo8.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Mention that :func:`asyncio.wait` requires a non-empty set of awaitables.