Skip to content

Add opcode cache for LOAD_ATTR #86259

Closed
Closed

Description

@pablogsal
BPO 42093
Nosy @gvanrossum, @vstinner, @1st1, @gvanrossum, @pablogsal
PRs
  • bpo-42093: Add opcode cache for LOAD_ATTR #22803
  • bpo-42093: Tweak the what's new message about the new LOAD_ATTR opcode cache #24070
  • bpo-42093: Cleanup _PyDict_GetItemHint() #24582
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = 'https://github.com/pablogsal'
    closed_at = <Date 2020-10-20.05:27:36.232>
    created_at = <Date 2020-10-20.03:18:36.160>
    labels = ['interpreter-core', '3.10']
    title = 'Add opcode cache for LOAD_ATTR'
    updated_at = <Date 2021-02-21.11:02:18.003>
    user = 'https://github.com/pablogsal'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2021-02-21.11:02:18.003>
    actor = 'vstinner'
    assignee = 'pablogsal'
    closed = True
    closed_date = <Date 2020-10-20.05:27:36.232>
    closer = 'pablogsal'
    components = ['Interpreter Core']
    creation = <Date 2020-10-20.03:18:36.160>
    creator = 'pablogsal'
    dependencies = []
    files = []
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 42093
    keywords = ['patch']
    message_count = 9.0
    messages = ['379083', '379087', '383859', '384087', '384254', '384354', '384364', '384366', '387451']
    nosy_count = 5.0
    nosy_names = ['gvanrossum', 'vstinner', 'yselivanov', 'Guido.van.Rossum', 'pablogsal']
    pr_nums = ['22803', '24070', '24582']
    priority = 'normal'
    resolution = 'fixed'
    stage = 'resolved'
    status = 'closed'
    superseder = None
    type = None
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue42093'
    versions = ['Python 3.10']

    Activity

    1. pablogsal commented on Oct 20, 2020

      @pablogsal
      MemberAuthor

      From the creators of "opcode cache for LOAD_GLOBAL" (https://bugs.python.org/issue26219) now it's time for "opcode cache for LOAD_ATTR: the revenge". This issue/PR builds on top of Yury's original patch in the same way https://bugs.python.org/issue26219 did for LOAD_GLOBAL.

      These are the benchmark results for the pyperformance test suite with PGO/LTO/CPU ISOLATION in a tuned system with pyperf:

      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | Benchmark | 2020-10-20_01-18-master-de73d432bb29 | 2020-10-20_02-28-cache-68f931f6938a |
      +=========================+======================================+=====================================+
      | go | 407 ms | 349 ms: 1.17x faster (-14%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | raytrace | 822 ms | 730 ms: 1.13x faster (-11%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | unpickle_pure_python | 497 us | 447 us: 1.11x faster (-10%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | scimark_sor | 311 ms | 280 ms: 1.11x faster (-10%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | hexiom | 15.4 ms | 14.0 ms: 1.10x faster (-9%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | logging_silent | 302 ns | 276 ns: 1.10x faster (-9%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | chaos | 176 ms | 163 ms: 1.08x faster (-7%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | pyflate | 1.01 sec | 948 ms: 1.06x faster (-6%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | scimark_lu | 246 ms | 232 ms: 1.06x faster (-6%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | pickle_pure_python | 712 us | 674 us: 1.06x faster (-5%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | regex_effbot | 4.49 ms | 4.26 ms: 1.05x faster (-5%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | scimark_monte_carlo | 160 ms | 153 ms: 1.05x faster (-5%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | richards | 120 ms | 115 ms: 1.05x faster (-4%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | 2to3 | 458 ms | 442 ms: 1.04x faster (-4%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | regex_v8 | 33.7 ms | 32.5 ms: 1.04x faster (-3%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | scimark_sparse_mat_mult | 7.16 ms | 6.93 ms: 1.03x faster (-3%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | deltablue | 12.1 ms | 11.7 ms: 1.03x faster (-3%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | regex_dna | 268 ms | 261 ms: 1.03x faster (-3%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | meteor_contest | 152 ms | 148 ms: 1.03x faster (-3%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | genshi_xml | 89.0 ms | 87.1 ms: 1.02x faster (-2%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | logging_simple | 12.8 us | 12.5 us: 1.02x faster (-2%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | genshi_text | 42.4 ms | 41.5 ms: 1.02x faster (-2%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
      | nbody | 215 ms | 211 ms: 1.02x faster (-2%) |
      +-------------------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+

      Not significant (35): chameleon; django_template; dulwich_log; fannkuch; float; json_dumps; json_loads; logging_format; mako; nqueens; pathlib; pickle; pickle_dict; pickle_list; pidigits; python_startup; python_startup_no_site; regex_compile; scimark_fft; spectral_norm; sqlalchemy_declarative; sqlalchemy_imperative; sqlite_synth; sympy_expand; sympy_sum; sympy_str; telco; tornado_http; unpack_sequence; unpickle; unpickle_list; xml_etree_parse; xml_etree_iterparse; xml_etree_generate; xml_etree_process; sympy_integrate

    2. self-assigned this
      on Oct 20, 2020
    3. pablogsal commented on Oct 20, 2020

      @pablogsal
      MemberAuthor

      New changeset 109826c by Pablo Galindo in branch 'master':
      bpo-42093: Add opcode cache for LOAD_ATTR (GH-22803)
      109826c

    4. gvanrossum commented on Dec 27, 2020

      @gvanrossum
      Member

      Wow, this is amazing. I just found that this is now faster than slots. Should we mention that in What's New?

      (Of course there's an optimization possible for slots as well, but it would require complicating the cache struct. Maybe in 3.11. :-)

    5. pablogsal commented on Dec 30, 2020

      @pablogsal
      MemberAuthor

      Wow, this is amazing. I just found that this is now faster than slots.

      Not only that: is even faster than the highly-tuned namedtuple access descriptors that used to be the faster access to an attribute:

      3.9 results
      -----------
      17.6 ns read_classvar_from_class
      16.3 ns read_classvar_from_instance
      23.2 ns read_instancevar
      19.7 ns read_instancevar_slots
      17.9 ns read_namedtuple
      39.2 ns read_boundmethod

      Now this is the faster way to get an attribute:

      3.10 results
      ------------
      17.9 ns read_classvar_from_class
      16.9 ns read_classvar_from_instance
      14.1 ns read_instancevar
      20.0 ns read_instancevar_slots
      18.0 ns read_namedtuple
      40.7 ns read_boundmethod

      Should we mention that in What's New?

      Good idea!. I will prepare a PR complementing the current paragraph.

    6. pablogsal commented on Jan 3, 2021

      @pablogsal
      MemberAuthor

      New changeset 9e8fe19 by Pablo Galindo in branch 'master':
      bpo-42093: Tweak the what's new message about the new LOAD_ATTR opcode cache (GH-24070)
      9e8fe19

    7. gvanrossum commented on Jan 4, 2021

      @gvanrossum
      Member

      Thanks! Do you have any plans for further inline caches? I was wondering if we could reverse the situation for slots again by adding slots support to the LOAD_ATTR opcode inline cache...

    8. pablogsal commented on Jan 5, 2021

      @pablogsal
      MemberAuthor

      Thanks! Do you have any plans for further inline caches?

      Yeah, we are experimenting with some ideas here: https://bugs.python.org/issue42115.

      I was wondering if we could reverse the situation for slots again by adding slots support to the LOAD_ATTR opcode inline cache...

      I think we can do it as long as we can detect easily if a given descriptor is immutable. The problem of mutability is this code:

      class Descriptor:
          pass
      
      class C:
          def __init__(self):
              self.x = 1
          x = Descriptor()
      
      def f(o):
          return o.x
      
      o = C()
      for i in range(10000):
          assert f(o) == 1
      
      Descriptor.__get__ = lambda self, instance, value: 2
      Descriptor.__set__ = lambda *args: None
      
      print(f(o))

      In this case, if we do not skip the cache for mutable descriptors, the code will not reflect the new result (2 instead of 1). __slots__ are immutable descriptors so we should be good as long as we can detect them.

    9. gvanrossum commented on Jan 5, 2021

      @gvanrossum
      Member

      Hm, I was thinking to recognize the specific type of descriptor used by slots and cache only that. Though we would still have to consider updates to C.__dict__ (that's handled by looking at the dict version right?).

    10. vstinner commented on Feb 21, 2021

      @vstinner
      Member

      New changeset d5fc998 by Victor Stinner in branch 'master':
      bpo-42093: Cleanup _PyDict_GetItemHint() (GH-24582)
      d5fc998

    11. transferred this issue fromon Apr 10, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Labels

    3.10 (EOL)end of lifeinterpreter-core(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions