You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
multipart/related header causes false positive StartBoundaryNotFoundDefect and MultipartInvariantViolationDefect #80407
The current implementation of multipart/related in urllib triggers header defects even though the headers are valid: [StartBoundaryNotFoundDefect(), MultipartInvariantViolationDefect()]
Both defects are triggered by the fact that httplib only passes on headers to the underlying email parser, while the email parser assumes to receive a full message. The simple fix is to tell the underlying email parser that we are only passing the header: 0a89fc15c93c271eb08e46e2cda9a72adb97d633
The second issue is related, but independent: The underlying email parser checks if the parsed message is of type multipart by checking of the object "root" is of type list. As we only passed the header (and set headersonly=True), the check does makes no sense anymore at this point, creating a false positive: fdc7c47b77e330a36255fd00dc36accd72824e5b
Probably the same as bpo-29353. I remember than enabling "headersonly" can create inconsistencies in the message object. But I don't remember the details.
According to bpo-29991 (another duplicate), my patch for bpo-24363 might help. But I don't think I got much enthusiasm reviewing that (and I don't have time to spend on it now).
grische commented on Mar 11, 2019
grischemannequin
MannequinAuthor
More actions
@martin.panter: I see a relation to bpo-29353, but I don't see why this report here is a duplicate. Could you elaborate on this?
bpo-29991 contains parts of what I reported here, but it is closed "resolved" and refers back to 29353.
I also tried your patch "policy-flag.patch" and it did not help in the regard of the bug here and tests which are included in the PR.
tzickel commented on Sep 4, 2019
tzickelmannequin
Mannequin
More actions
It should be noted that this causes a big headache for users of requests / urllib3 / etc... as those print on each multipart response a logging warning based on this bug, and it might cause people to go try debugging valid code:
Activity
grische commentedon Mar 7, 2019
The current implementation of
multipart/relatedin urllib triggers header defects even though the headers are valid:[StartBoundaryNotFoundDefect(), MultipartInvariantViolationDefect()]The example header is valid according to RFC 2387 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2387):
Both defects are triggered by the fact that httplib only passes on headers to the underlying email parser, while the email parser assumes to receive a full message. The simple fix is to tell the underlying email parser that we are only passing the header: 0a89fc15c93c271eb08e46e2cda9a72adb97d633
The second issue is related, but independent: The underlying email parser checks if the parsed message is of type multipart by checking of the object "root" is of type list. As we only passed the header (and set
headersonly=True), the check does makes no sense anymore at this point, creating a false positive: fdc7c47b77e330a36255fd00dc36accd72824e5bgrische commentedon Mar 7, 2019
Apologies, here are the correct commit IDs:
8928543
a82e662
vadmium commentedon Mar 7, 2019
Probably the same as bpo-29353. I remember than enabling "headersonly" can create inconsistencies in the message object. But I don't remember the details.
According to bpo-29991 (another duplicate), my patch for bpo-24363 might help. But I don't think I got much enthusiasm reviewing that (and I don't have time to spend on it now).
grische commentedon Mar 11, 2019
@martin.panter: I see a relation to bpo-29353, but I don't see why this report here is a duplicate. Could you elaborate on this?
bpo-29991 contains parts of what I reported here, but it is closed "resolved" and refers back to 29353.
I also tried your patch "policy-flag.patch" and it did not help in the regard of the bug here and tests which are included in the PR.
tzickel commentedon Sep 4, 2019
It should be noted that this causes a big headache for users of requests / urllib3 / etc... as those print on each multipart response a logging warning based on this bug, and it might cause people to go try debugging valid code:
urllib3/urllib3#800
psf/requests#3001
diyan/pywinrm#269
jborean93/pypsrp#39
home-assistant/core#17042
Azure/azure-storage-python#167
and others....