Skip to content

3.4 cherry-pick: de81e0fe4905 Pydocs module docs server not working on Windows. #65033

Closed

Description

@loewis
mannequin
BPO 20834
Nosy @loewis, @vstinner, @larryhastings

Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = 'https://github.com/larryhastings'
closed_at = <Date 2014-03-06.17:29:43.740>
created_at = <Date 2014-03-02.19:32:22.439>
labels = ['release-blocker']
title = '3.4 cherry-pick: de81e0fe4905 Pydocs module docs server not working on Windows.'
updated_at = <Date 2014-03-06.17:29:43.739>
user = 'https://github.com/loewis'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2014-03-06.17:29:43.739>
actor = 'larry'
assignee = 'larry'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2014-03-06.17:29:43.740>
closer = 'larry'
components = []
creation = <Date 2014-03-02.19:32:22.439>
creator = 'loewis'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 20834
keywords = []
message_count = 4.0
messages = ['212583', '212711', '212729', '212822']
nosy_count = 3.0
nosy_names = ['loewis', 'vstinner', 'larry']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'release blocker'
resolution = 'fixed'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue20834'
versions = ['Python 3.4']

Activity

  1. loewis commented on Mar 2, 2014

    loewismannequin
    MannequinAuthor

    New changeset de81e0fe4905 by Martin v. Löwis in branch 'default':
    Issue bpo-14512: Launch pydoc -b instead of pydocgui.pyw on Windows.
    http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/de81e0fe4905

  2. vstinner commented on Mar 4, 2014

    @vstinner
    Member

    If I understood correctly, it doesn't look like a regression of Python 3.4. So it may wait for Python 3.4.1.

  3. changed the title [-]3.4 cherry-pick: de81e0fe4905[/-] [+]3.4 cherry-pick: de81e0fe4905 Pydocs module docs server not working on Windows.[/+] on Mar 4, 2014
  4. loewis commented on Mar 4, 2014

    loewismannequin
    MannequinAuthor

    I agree that the issue is not release-critical.

  5. larryhastings commented on Mar 6, 2014

    @larryhastings
    Contributor

    ok. I agree it's not critical, but on the other hand it's low-risk.

  6. transferred this issue fromon Apr 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions