You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
You know how you start pulling on a thread and before you notice you've unraveled the whole sweater? I meant to do a simple *one line* fix on the docs and wound up with a nearly-300-line diff. I claim it's all an improvement, though I'm willing to change it if there's something you don't like.
Definite improvements:
supports_fd et al are :class:`set` objects, not :class:`~collections.Set`. Those are different.
Linked to the "specifying a file descriptor" section in os from the relevant discussion in what's new.
"Availability: Unix" goes above :versionadded.
Avowed improvements:
supports_* now explicitly mention what values are permitted for their parameters.
Lots of rewriting/munging in an effort to improve readability and precision.
A couple places where "it's" read better than "it is".
I would, but I can't get it to apply cleanly, either to tip or to historical revisions back in Sepember. Kaleb, what revision is the branch that you generated the diff from?
I've made a pull request for your patch. It seemed like most of the original text was still in place, so I thought you might still want these changes. You had also made changes to the What's New, but I didn't include those changes.
Activity
larryhastings commentedon Sep 24, 2012
You know how you start pulling on a thread and before you notice you've unraveled the whole sweater? I meant to do a simple *one line* fix on the docs and wound up with a nearly-300-line diff. I claim it's all an improvement, though I'm willing to change it if there's something you don't like.
Definite improvements:
Avowed improvements:
LGTU?
akuchling commentedon Nov 3, 2012
Patch looks good with two small changes.
"for consistency's sakes" is used in 2 places; this should be "sake", not the plural "sakes".
"Normally the *path* argument specified to functions": 'specified to' sounds wrong, and IMHO would be better as 'provided to' or 'passed to'.
The last hunk in the patch to 3.3.rst, but the new text still seems an improvement.
kkvr05 commentedon May 13, 2013
Adding a revision of the .diff file according to akuchling's comment.
akuchling commentedon May 14, 2013
Kaleb Robertson's changes look good. Larry, do you want to go ahead and commit this?
larryhastings commentedon May 20, 2013
I would, but I can't get it to apply cleanly, either to tip or to historical revisions back in Sepember. Kaleb, what revision is the branch that you generated the diff from?
larryhastings commentedon May 20, 2013
p.s. Thanks for reviving the patch. I forgot about this one!
csabella commentedon Feb 3, 2018
Larry,
I've made a pull request for your patch. It seemed like most of the original text was still in place, so I thought you might still want these changes. You had also made changes to the What's New, but I didn't include those changes.
larryhastings commentedon May 6, 2019
New changeset e152169 by larryhastings (Cheryl Sabella) in branch 'master':
bpo-16024: Doc cleanup regarding path_fd, dir_fd, follow_symlinks (GH-5505)
e152169
larryhastings commentedon May 6, 2019
At last! Thanks for reviving it, Cheryl!