Repository navigation
time.sleep() should use nanosleep() if available #58189
Description
| BPO | 13981 |
|---|---|
| Nosy | @vstinner |
| Dependencies |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2012-03-02.21:40:58.665>
created_at = <Date 2012-02-09.23:00:33.850>
labels = ['library']
title = 'time.sleep() should use nanosleep() if available'
updated_at = <Date 2012-03-02.21:40:58.664>
user = 'https://github.com/vstinner'bugs.python.org fields:
activity = <Date 2012-03-02.21:40:58.664>
actor = 'vstinner'
assignee = 'none'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2012-03-02.21:40:58.665>
closer = 'vstinner'
components = ['Library (Lib)']
creation = <Date 2012-02-09.23:00:33.850>
creator = 'vstinner'
dependencies = ['13882']
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 13981
keywords = []
message_count = 2.0
messages = ['153000', '154804']
nosy_count = 3.0
nosy_names = ['vstinner', 'Arfrever', 'rosslagerwall']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'wont fix'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue13981'
versions = ['Python 3.3']
Activity
vstinner commentedon Feb 9, 2012
With the PEP-410, it is possible to store timestamps with a resolution of 1 nanosecond. Python should use nanosleep() if the function is available for time.sleep().
This issue depends on issue bpo-13882.
vstinner commentedon Mar 2, 2012
The PEP-410 has been rejected, so I close the issue.