Skip to content

sendmsg operation for unix sockets #39333

Closed

Description

@phr
mannequin
BPO 814689
Nosy @loewis
Superseder
  • bpo-1194378: sendmsg() and recvmsg() for C socket module
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = None
    closed_at = <Date 2008-05-21.07:30:13.616>
    created_at = <Date 2003-09-29.19:58:43.000>
    labels = ['type-feature']
    title = 'sendmsg operation for unix sockets'
    updated_at = <Date 2008-05-21.07:30:13.501>
    user = 'https://bugs.python.org/phr'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2008-05-21.07:30:13.501>
    actor = 'georg.brandl'
    assignee = 'none'
    closed = True
    closed_date = <Date 2008-05-21.07:30:13.616>
    closer = 'georg.brandl'
    components = ['None']
    creation = <Date 2003-09-29.19:58:43.000>
    creator = 'phr'
    dependencies = []
    files = []
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 814689
    keywords = []
    message_count = 3.0
    messages = ['61124', '61125', '61126']
    nosy_count = 2.0
    nosy_names = ['loewis', 'phr']
    pr_nums = []
    priority = 'normal'
    resolution = 'duplicate'
    stage = None
    status = 'closed'
    superseder = '1194378'
    type = 'enhancement'
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue814689'
    versions = []

    Activity

    1. phr commented on Sep 29, 2003

      phrmannequin
      MannequinAuthor

      The socket module doesn't seem to support the sendmsg
      operation for AF_UNIX sockets, at least in Python 2.2.2
      under Linux. This is needed to send ancillary messages
      to sockets. Those in turn allow a process to see the
      user id of its peer, allows sending file descriptors to
      other processes (needed for anything like User Mode
      Linux so that non-root processes can open privileged
      ports), and so forth.

    2. loewis commented on Oct 20, 2003

      loewismannequin
      Mannequin

      Logged In: YES
      user_id=21627

      Would you like to work on a patch?

    3. phr commented on Nov 13, 2003

      phrmannequin
      MannequinAuthor

      Logged In: YES
      user_id=72053

      I may see about putting a patch together but don't hold your
      breath. Main purpose of this RFE is to track the item. It's
      not urgent for me right now.

    4. transferred this issue fromon Apr 9, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    No one assigned

      Labels

      type-featureA feature request or enhancement

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions