Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

Seems like when adding warnings.deprecated in #104004, it was forgotten to add one of the two stack skipping arguments.

It needs it for the same reasons why it already got stacklevel, e.g. because adding decorators adds stack levels in a hard to predict way (e.g. a 3rd party decorator might start calling the wrapped function one level deeper, suddenly changing where the warning points)

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

Yes, and it was accepted, but then apparently fogotten, see link below

cc @brettcannon @JelleZijlstra

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-702-marking-deprecations-using-the-type-system/23036/11

Linked PRs

• gh-156929: add skip_file_prefixes to warnings.deprecated #156937