Add missing G53 for absolute zchange in milldrill.#611
Merged
Conversation
At best, if your absolute zchange position was 0mm, you would have been presented with an impossible tool change. At worse, for a negative zchange position, your CNC would have attempted murder on your workpiece. The final retraction at the end of the program already has the G53 prefix.
Contributor
Author
|
Same as #609 |
Contributor
|
Thank you for updating the tests! |
Collaborator
Contributor
Author
|
No problem. I just run |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
At best, if your absolute zchange position was 0mm, you would have been
presented with an impossible tool change. At worse, for a negative
zchange position, your CNC would have attempted murder on your
workpiece.
The final retraction at the end of the program already has the G53
prefix.