-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 392
docs(readme): add storybook-deploy notes as well as new pr template u… #101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -35,11 +35,11 @@ For example, to deploy to your `upstream` remote: | |
| ``` | ||
| npm run storybook:deploy -- --remote=upstream | ||
| ``` | ||
| To deploy Storybook to a target branch and serve with rawgit instead of gh-pages, pass `--branch` flag | ||
| to `npm run storybook:deploy`. | ||
| For example, to deploy to `feature-branch` target: | ||
| To deploy Storybook to a target branch and serve with rawgit instead of gh-pages, pass `--branch` flag to `npm run storybook:deploy`. This will create a new branch to serve your Storybook (and will be useful if you have multiple open pull requests). | ||
|
|
||
| For example, say you have `feature-branch`, you can deploy the storybook to a rawgit branch with: | ||
| ``` | ||
| npm run storybook:deploy -- --branch=feature-branch | ||
| npm run storybook:deploy -- --branch=feature-branch-storybook | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Perfect 🎉 |
||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ## Meeting Notes | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm wondering if it makes sense to add this in addition to the issues referenced from the
npm run commitprocess that identifies them. Will this create duplicate referencing? It may be fine, just a thought.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@danseethaler good question... My understanding is that adding "Closes # X" within
npm run commitOR adding "Closes # X" in the PR notes will close the issue. I guess my preference would be to include "Closes" in the PR comments (under the first question) instead of the commit b/c there are certain cases we might not close an issue, but still merge a commit (so you'd have flexibility to change it at any point). I'm flexible on this though (and think either is OK). Thoughts?I made a note about additional issues at the end for a few things that you might list:
I'm quite flexible on this and curious what others think...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, it's also my preference to have the issues reference in the PR description rather than the commit message since it's much more visible when glancing at a PR. I'm mostly wondering if we're asking for it in both places if it will show multiple references in the issue we're closing. Not a huge deal either way.
I think what you've got here is good and we see how it goes 👍🏼