Skip to content

TST: Verify dot products with matrix transposes - #6930

Merged
njsmith merged 1 commit into
numpy:masterfrom
jakirkham:test_dot_trans
Jan 6, 2016
Merged

TST: Verify dot products with matrix transposes#6930
njsmith merged 1 commit into
numpy:masterfrom
jakirkham:test_dot_trans

Conversation

@jakirkham

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Related: #6794
Related: #6932

Tries different products with transposes to verify that correct result is gotten. Makes sure to try combinations that don't share memory, as well.

@charris

charris commented Jan 3, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

You want these tests for future work, yes?

@jakirkham

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Correct, this is to make sure I don't mess something up. :) If you have pointers or thoughts on additional tests, I am open to suggestions.

@jakirkham

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I think I should add some inner product tests, as well.

@jakirkham jakirkham changed the title TST: Verify dot products with matrix transposes WIP: TST: Verify dot products with matrix transposes Jan 4, 2016
@jakirkham
jakirkham force-pushed the test_dot_trans branch 8 times, most recently from 330b071 to 66eeeae Compare January 4, 2016 14:34
@jakirkham jakirkham changed the title WIP: TST: Verify dot products with matrix transposes TST: Verify dot products with matrix transposes Jan 4, 2016
@jakirkham

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I've decided to skip inner based tests as part of this PR group and just focus on dot for now.

@jakirkham

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Rebased.

@njsmith

njsmith commented Jan 6, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Can't see how more tests could do any harm :-) Thanks @jakirkham

njsmith added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2016
TST: Verify dot products with matrix transposes
@njsmith
njsmith merged commit 7d67348 into numpy:master Jan 6, 2016
@jakirkham
jakirkham deleted the test_dot_trans branch January 6, 2016 12:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants