checkout: use empty baseline when no index file exists#3823
Merged
Conversation
When no index file exists and a baseline is not explicitly provided, use an empty baseline instead of trying to load `HEAD`.
Member
Author
|
Note that this is still not completely correct: the "is this dirty" checkout conflict handling is not correctly taking the index into account but that's a different (and bigger) issue and I will follow up with a related pull request. |
Member
|
Seems legit. Or at least we're doing mostly what git does. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When no index file exists and a baseline is not explicitly provided, use an empty baseline instead of trying to use
HEADas the baseline.This is for compatibility with git:
Our previous behavior was to try to load
HEADwhen the index does not exist, which would simply do a diff between the baseline (HEAD) and the target (again,HEAD), which would be a noop.Fixes #3811