It seems to me that the current specification has an inconsistency. The resource linkage may support ordered relationships, and an ordered relationship may have missing elements. Thus, the resource linkage list should allow null elements to represent to-many ordered relationships in which some elements are missing.
It seems to me that the current specification has an inconsistency. The resource linkage may support ordered relationships, and an ordered relationship may have missing elements. Thus, the resource linkage list should allow null elements to represent to-many ordered relationships in which some elements are missing.