┌────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Area │ Custom Workers │ GitHub Actions │ ├────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Infrastructure │ You manage Redis, containers, scaling, monitoring, restarts │ GitHub manages everything │ ├────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Runner maintenance │ Patching, security updates, dependency management │ GitHub handles updates │ ├────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Secrets management │ Must secure API keys, tokens in your infra │ Built-in encrypted secrets │ ├────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Scaling │ Manual scaling, container orchestration (K8s?) │ Auto-scales with usage limits │ ├────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Cost │ Fixed infra cost regardless of usage │ Pay per minute (free tier available) │ ├────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Networking │ Must expose endpoints, handle firewalls, mTLS │ No inbound connections needed │ ├────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ State management │ Redis streams, consumer groups, message acks │ Stateless, GitHub handles retries │ ├────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ PR comments │ Need GitHub App token, API calls, rate limits │ Native github.token, built-in actions │ ├────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Logs/debugging │ Build your own logging/tracing │ Built-in logs in PR UI │ ├────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Concurrency │ Manage consumer groups, avoid duplicate processing │ Matrix builds, job concurrency controls │ └────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────┘ When custom makes sense:
- Need to run on internal network (access private resources)
- Scans require licensed tools not available in Actions
- Want full control over execution environment
- Need long-running jobs (Actions has 6hr limit)
- Cost optimization at high volume
When GitHub Actions wins:
- Faster time to market
- Less operational burden
- Better GitHub integration (checks API, annotations, PR status)
- Community actions ecosystem (KICS, Blackduck actions already exist)
- No infrastructure to secure/maintain
For security scanning, Actions is typically simpler since tools like checkmarx/kics-github-action and synopsys-sig/blackduck-action already exist.
GitHub Actions (Distributed Model) ┌───────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Pros │ Cons │ ├───────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Zero infra to manage │ 100-500 repos need workflow files │ ├───────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ GitHub scales runners │ Version drift across repos │ ├───────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Native PR integration │ Teams must understand Actions syntax │ ├───────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ │ Reusable workflows help but still need adoption │ ├───────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ │ Org-wide updates = 500 PRs or push access │ ├───────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ │ Teams can modify/disable workflows │ └───────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ Custom Centralized (Your Approach) ┌───────────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Pros │ Cons │ ├───────────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Install GitHub App once per org │ You own the infrastructure │ ├───────────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Zero repo changes needed │ Day 2 ops: monitoring, alerting, on-call │ ├───────────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Security team has full control │ Scaling: K8s, auto-scaling, queue depth │ ├───────────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Consistent enforcement │ HA/DR requirements │ ├───────────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Single codebase to update │ Build GitHub integration yourself │ ├───────────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Teams don't need to know anything │ Debugging distributed system │ └───────────────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────────────┘ At 100-500 repo scale, the math shifts:
GitHub Actions:
- Engineering overhead: onboarding teams, workflow updates, drift
- Operational overhead: low (GitHub's problem)
Custom Solution:
- Engineering overhead: one-time build, single codebase
- Operational overhead: high (infra, scaling, reliability)
Hybrid option worth considering:
Use GitHub App webhook to trigger GitHub Actions workflow via workflow_dispatch:
PR opened → GitHub App → workflow_dispatch API → triggers shared workflow
- Security team controls trigger logic centrally
- No workflow files in each repo
- GitHub manages runners/scaling
- Best of both worlds
Would you like to explore that pattern?