Repository navigation
Conversation
Contributor
|
gnidan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2026
* bugc: compile `!` as a logical not * bugc: link the changelog entry to #353 * bugc: end each source range at its last token * bugc: link the changelog entry to #362 * bugc: add block.prevrandao * bugc: link the changelog entries to #363 * bugc: hash several value-type words with keccak256 * bugc: link the changelog entries to #365 * bugc: slice a fixed-size bytes value by its bytes * bugc: link the changelog entry to #357 * bugc: hash the data of dynamic bytes and strings * bugc: link the changelog entry to #360 * bugc: give a caller's call JUMP the invoke's arguments * bugc: list variables before a function's first statement * bugc: store a memory string's bytes when assigning it to storage A storage write took its value as a word, so a memory string or bytes reference wrote its memory address into the slot. Code generation now encodes the referenced bytes as Solidity does: inline with length * 2 up to 31 bytes, else length * 2 + 1 in the slot and the data from keccak256(slot), with the last word's trailing bytes cleared. A slice now carries the bytes type, so its value is recognized too. * bugc: link the changelog entry to #355 * bugc: say why the bytes test slices without naming the copy width * bugc: copy all of a slice's bytes irgen built a slice's data as a read and a write, and a read or write moves at most one word, so only the first 32 bytes were copied. Add a copy IR instruction (CALLDATACOPY from calldata, MCOPY from memory) and emit it for the slice's data. * bugc: link the changelog entries to #359 * bugc: copy a struct read from storage into memory * bugc: link the changelog entries to #361 * bugc: lay storage arrays out as Solidity does * bugc: add push to dynamic arrays in storage
Member
Author
|
Included in #368. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
!takes abool(the type checker rejects any other operand), but evmgen compiled it to the EVM's bitwiseNOT. So!truewas0xff…feand!falsewas0xff…ff: both non-zero, so bothtruein a condition. Anyif (!x)took the same branch whateverxwas.The unary
notnow compiles toISZERO. The optimizer does not fold unary operations, so codegen is the only place that changes.The new behavioral test stores
!t,!!t,!of a function's result, and branches on!t, at each optimization level.