Repository navigation
Project lacks process #3
Description
How will work progress with this effort? How will we know if work is progressing?
Standards groups operate in projects with processes. These processes get documented. Sometimes a meeting schedule exists. This ethdebug project, in its infancy, has none of that yet.
Likely this will also need to include a list of responsible/consulted/etc. parties
Activity
chaals commentedon Nov 15, 2022
I suggest you aim for something like "rough consensus" as a decision-making process. The critical bit then is to work out who decides when there is rough consensus.
chaals commentedon Feb 22, 2023
Is the decision-making process for merging a PR documented somewhere? That seems important for anyone who wants to contribute but doesn't start out being part of the "in-crowd" ...
format: describe inlining eligibility qualitatively (decision #3)
format: spec the inlined-call virtual activation contract (#229)
format: spec the inlined-call virtual activation contract (#229)
format: spec the inlined-call virtual activation contract (#229)
format: spec the inlined-call virtual activation contract (#229)
format: spec the inlined-call virtual activation contract (#229)
format: spec the inlined-call virtual activation contract (#229)