Skip to content

One of the forks has a Makefile#6

Merged
digistump merged 3 commits into
digistump:masterfrom
christopherpoole:master
Mar 20, 2014
Merged

One of the forks has a Makefile#6
digistump merged 3 commits into
digistump:masterfrom
christopherpoole:master

Conversation

@sodabrew
Copy link
Copy Markdown

When I Googled "DigiSpark Makefile" I found this blog post:
http://christopherpoole.github.io/developing-for-the-digispark-without-the-arduino-ide/

This looks reasonable, so I'd like to propose merging this into the mainline tree and/or discuss what else could be done to provide a non-Arduino IDE approach to building code for the DigiSpark.

digistump pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2014
One of the forks has a Makefile
@digistump digistump merged commit 98d4f0e into digistump:master Mar 20, 2014
@digistump
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Looks great thanks for finding this -

Given that the micronucleaus command line tool is so easy to use standalone - I don't have any ideas of what else to do to make it easier to use with a non-Arduino IDE approach - but I'm happy to help make changes if you have any more ideas.

@sodabrew
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thanks! I wonder if this pinged @christopherpoole - Ping!

@christopherpoole
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for picking this up. I had almost forgotten about it.

Without the Arudino IDE, a digispark becomes very light weight - even more so. I would say the micronucleaus command line tool is already easy enough to use. However, maybe there is scope for a more complex IDE-less example.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants