Skip to content

🛡️ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix timing attack in server authentication - #4

Open
ddqd wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
fix-auth-timing-attack-394256041273505470
Open

🛡️ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix timing attack in server authentication#4
ddqd wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
fix-auth-timing-attack-394256041273505470

Conversation

@ddqd

@ddqd ddqd commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🛡️ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix timing attack in server authentication

🚨 Severity: HIGH
💡 Vulnerability: Server authentication used a standard string equality (===) check to compare passwords, which short-circuits and is vulnerable to timing attacks, allowing attackers to guess passwords character by character.
🎯 Impact: Attackers could potentially bypass authentication on the server by brute-forcing the password via a timing attack.
🔧 Fix: Used crypto.timingSafeEqual for constant-time string comparison. Added a dummy comparison when password lengths differ to prevent length leakage.
✅ Verification: Ran packages/server and packages/opencode test suites locally, which passed successfully, ensuring no regressions.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 394256041273505470 started by @ddqd

🚨 Severity: HIGH
💡 Vulnerability: Server authentication used a standard string equality (`===`) check to compare passwords, which short-circuits and is vulnerable to timing attacks, allowing attackers to guess passwords character by character.
🎯 Impact: Attackers could potentially bypass authentication on the server by brute-forcing the password via a timing attack.
🔧 Fix: Used `crypto.timingSafeEqual` for constant-time string comparison. Added a dummy comparison when password lengths differ to prevent length leakage.
✅ Verification: Ran `packages/server` and `packages/opencode` test suites locally, which passed successfully, ensuring no regressions.

Co-authored-by: ddqd <[email protected]>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant