feat: promote codersdk chat API methods to Client - #28497
Conversation
|
@codex review |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: c8984683d3
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
c898468 to
437d032
Compare
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
437d032 to
259fb81
Compare
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
259fb81 to
0d3d823
Compare
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Another round soon, please! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
0d3d823 to
5ee8005
Compare
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Swish! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
5ee8005 to
025abd3
Compare
|
@codex review Please review current head
|
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 👍 Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
025abd3 to
3fdbf8f
Compare
|
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. What shall we delve into next? Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
3fdbf8f to
7339f6b
Compare
|
@codex review Please review current head
|
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Swish! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
7339f6b to
c032a19
Compare
|
@codex review Please review current head
|
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Delightful! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
c032a19 to
21b6086
Compare
|
@codex review Please review current head
|
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉 Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
21b6086 to
a57eda6
Compare
a57eda6 to
b380c89
Compare
b380c89 to
1ab6d80
Compare
## Stack context This is the base of a 3-PR stack promoting the chat API from `/api/experimental` to `/api/v2`: server compatibility mounts (this PR), codersdk promotion (#28497), and frontend path updates (#28498). ## Summary Double-mount the stable chat and MCP handlers under `/api/v2` while retaining the existing experimental routes for the one-release compatibility window decided in CODAGT-921. CODAGT-922 tracks removing the compatibility mounts. The shared route builders preserve existing authentication and middleware behavior. Experiment-gated, debug, tombstone, and legacy default-organization model routes remain experimental-only. Signed file URLs, external OAuth callback URLs, and mixed-version replica relays also remain on the experimental prefix during the transition. Update Swagger and the generated API reference for the promoted routes, including the workspace lookup and a runnable raw-body chat file upload example. Retain internal endpoints outside the published reference, share chat-file rate limits across both prefixes, enable CORS for the v2 MCP routes, and cover dual mounts plus exclusions with compatibility tests. Remote dogfood UAT passed for the promoted chat, model, MCP, and file flows. > [!NOTE] > Xum acted on Mike's behalf in this pull request. <!-- xum-attribution: model=claude-fable-5 thinking=high -->
Peer replicas may run a pre-promotion release during a rolling upgrade, so the internal parts relay keeps dialing /api/experimental until CODAGT-922 removes the window.
GET /chats/models is no longer promoted to /api/v2 (superseded by the organization-scoped collection; #28632 removes it), so point the disclosure comparison back at the experimental path.
59a7d67 to
00207f2
Compare
Reverts the rolling-upgrade defense added during PR review: mixed-version replica sets are not a supported upgrade path (replicas scale to zero during upgrades), and keeping the internal relay on /api/experimental would itself 404 once CODAGT-922 removes the experimental mounts. Requested by mafredri in review.
3 participants
Stack context
This is the second PR in the 3-PR chat API promotion stack: server compatibility mounts (#28496), codersdk promotion (this PR), and frontend path updates (#28498).
Summary
Move the promoted chat and MCP SDK methods from
ExperimentalClienttoClientand update them to use/api/v2. Methods for routes that remain experimental stay onExperimentalClient.Update in-repository callers and generated types. The multi-replica chat stream relay dials
/api/v2directly: mixed-version replica sets are not a supported upgrade path, so no experimental-path fallback is kept (per review). Remote dogfood UAT passed for the composed stack.Note
Xum acted on Mike's behalf in this pull request.