-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathtutorial.xml
More file actions
353 lines (300 loc) · 13.3 KB
/
tutorial.xml
File metadata and controls
353 lines (300 loc) · 13.3 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE library PUBLIC "-//Boost//DTD BoostBook XML V1.0//EN"
"http://www.boost.org/tools/boostbook/dtd/boostbook.dtd"
[
<!ENTITY % entities SYSTEM "program_options.ent" >
%entities;
]>
<section id="program_options.tutorial">
<title>Tutorial</title>
<para>In this section, we'll take a look at the most common usage scenarios
of the program_options library, starting with the simplest one. The examples
show only the interesting code parts, but the complete programs can be found
in the "BOOST_ROOT/libs/program_options/example" directory. Through all the
examples, we'll assume that the following namespace alias is in effect:
<programlisting>namespace po = boost::program_options;</programlisting>
</para>
<section>
<title>Getting Started</title>
<para>The first example is the simplest possible: it only handles two
options. Here's the source code (the full program is in
"example/first.cpp"):
<programlisting>
// Declare the supported options.
po::options_description desc("Allowed options");
desc.add_options()
("help", "produce help message")
("compression", po::value<int>(), "set compression level")
;
po::variables_map vm;
po::store(po::parse_command_line(ac, av, desc), vm);
po::notify(vm);
if (vm.count("help")) {
cout << desc << "\n";
return 1;
}
if (vm.count("compression")) {
cout << "Compression level was set to "
<< vm["compression"].as<int>() << ".\n";
} else {
cout << "Compression level was not set.\n";
}
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>We start by declaring all allowed options using the
&options_description; class. The <code>add_options</code> method of that
class returns a special proxy object that defines
<code>operator()</code>. Calls to that operator actually declare
options. The parameters are option name, information about value, and option
description. In this example, the first option has no value, and the second
one has a value of type <code>int</code>.
</para>
<para>After that, an object of class <code>variables_map</code> is
declared. That class is intended to store values of options, and can store
values of arbitrary types. Next, the calls to <code>store</code>,
<code>parse_command_line</code> and <code>notify</code> functions cause
<code>vm</code> to contain all the options found on the command
line.</para>
<para>And now, finally, we can use the options as we like. The
<code>variables_map</code> class can be used just like
<code>std::map</code>, except that values stored there must be retrieved
with the <code>as</code> method shown above. (If the type specified in the
call to the <code>as</code> method is different from the actually stored
type, an exception is thrown.)
</para>
<para>It's now a good time to try compiling the code yourself, but if
you're not yet ready, here's an example session:
<screen>
$ <userinput>bin/gcc/debug/first</userinput>
Compression level was not set.
$ <userinput>bin/gcc/debug/first --help</userinput>
Allowed options:
--help : produce help message
--compression arg : set compression level
$ <userinput>bin/gcc/debug/first --compression 10</userinput>
Compression level was set to 10.
</screen>
</para>
</section>
<section>
<title>Option Details</title>
<para>An option value, surely, can have other types than <code>int</code>, and
can have other interesting properties, which we'll discuss right now. The
complete version of the code snipped below can be found in
<filename>example/options_description.cpp</filename>.</para>
<para>Imagine we're writing a compiler. It should take the optimization
level, a number of include paths, and a number of input files, and perform some
interesting work. Let's describe the options:
<programlisting>
int opt;
po::options_description desc("Allowed options");
desc.add_options()
("help", "produce help message")
("optimization", po::value<int>(&opt)->default_value(10),
"optimization level")
("include-path,I", po::value< vector<string> >(),
"include path")
("input-file", po::value< vector<string> >(), "input file")
;
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>The <literal>"help"</literal> option should be familiar from
the previous example. It's a good idea to have this option in all cases.
</para>
<para>The <literal>"optimization"</literal> option shows two new features. First, we specify
the address of the variable(<code>&opt</code>). After storing values, that
variable will have the value of the option. Second, we specify a default
value of 10, which will be used if no value is specified by the user.
</para>
<para>The <literal>"include-path"</literal> option is an example of the
only case where the interface of the <code>options_description</code>
class serves only one
source -- the command line. Users typically like to use short option names
for common options, and the "include-path,I" name specifies that short
option name is "I". So, both "--include-path" and "-I" can be used.
</para>
<para>Note also that the type of the <literal>"include-path"</literal>
option is <type>std::vector</type>. The library provides special
support for vectors -- it will be possible to specify the option several
times, and all specified values will be collected in one vector.
</para>
<para>The "input-file" option specifies the list of files to
process. That's okay for a start, but, of course, writing something like:
<screen>
<userinput>compiler --input-file=a.cpp</userinput>
</screen>
is a little non-standard, compared with
<screen>
<userinput>compiler a.cpp</userinput>
</screen>
We'll address this in a moment.
</para>
<para>
The command line tokens which have no option name, as above, are
called "positional options" by this library. They can be handled
too. With a little help from the user, the library can decide that "a.cpp"
really means the same as "--input-file=a.cpp". Here's the additional code
we need:
<programlisting>
po::positional_options_description p;
p.add("input-file", -1);
po::variables_map vm;
po::store(po::command_line_parser(ac, av).
options(desc).positional(p).run(), vm);
po::notify(vm);
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
The first two lines say that all positional options should be translated
into "input-file" options. Also note that we use the
&command_line_parser; class to parse the command
line, not the &parse_command_line;
function. The latter is a convenient wrapper for simple cases, but now we
need to pass additional information.
</para>
<para>By now, all options are described and parsed. We'll save ourselves the
trouble of implementing the rest of the compiler logic and only print the
options:
<programlisting>
if (vm.count("include-path"))
{
cout << "Include paths are: "
<< vm["include-path"].as< vector<string> >() << "\n";
}
if (vm.count("input-file"))
{
cout << "Input files are: "
<< vm["input-file"].as< vector<string> >() << "\n";
}
cout << "Optimization level is " << opt << "\n";
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>Here's an example session:
<screen>
$ <userinput>bin/gcc/debug/options_description --help</userinput>
Usage: options_description [options]
Allowed options:
--help : produce help message
--optimization arg : optimization level
-I [ --include-path ] arg : include path
--input-file arg : input file
$ <userinput>bin/gcc/debug/options_description</userinput>
Optimization level is 10
$ <userinput>bin/gcc/debug/options_description --optimization 4 -I foo -I another/path --include-path third/include/path a.cpp b.cpp</userinput>
Include paths are: foo another/path third/include/path
Input files are: a.cpp b.cpp
Optimization level is 4
</screen>
</para>
<para>
Oops, there's a slight problem. It's still possible to specify the
"--input-file" option, and usage message says so, which can be confusing
for the user. It would be nice to hide this information, but let's wait
for the next example.
</para>
</section>
<section>
<title>Multiple Sources</title>
<para>It's quite likely that specifying all options to our compiler on the
command line will annoy users. What if a user installs a new library and
wants to always pass an additional command line element? What if he has
made some choices which should be applied on every run? It's desirable to
create a config file with common settings which will be used together with
the command line.
</para>
<para>Of course, there will be a need to combine the values from command
line and config file. For example, the optimization level specified on the
command line should override the value from the config file. On the other
hand, include paths should be combined.
</para>
<para>Let's see the code now. The complete program is in
"examples/multiple_sources.cpp". The option definition has two interesting
details. First, we declare several instances of the
<code>options_description</code> class. The reason is that, in general,
not all options are alike. Some options, like "input-file" above, should
not be presented in an automatic help message. Some options make sense only
in the config file. Finally, it's nice to have some structure in the help message,
not just a long list of options. Let's declare several option groups:
<programlisting>
// Declare a group of options that will be
// allowed only on command line
po::options_description generic("Generic options");
generic.add_options()
("version,v", "print version string")
("help", "produce help message")
;
// Declare a group of options that will be
// allowed both on command line and in
// config file
po::options_description config("Configuration");
config.add_options()
("optimization", po::value<int>(&opt)->default_value(10),
"optimization level")
("include-path,I",
po::value< vector<string> >()->composing(),
"include path")
;
// Hidden options, will be allowed both on command line and
// in config file, but will not be shown to the user.
po::options_description hidden("Hidden options");
hidden.add_options()
("input-file", po::value< vector<string> >(), "input file")
;
</programlisting>
Note the call to the <code>composing</code> method in the declaration of the
"include-path" option. It tells the library that values from different sources
should be composed together, as we'll see shortly.
</para>
<para>
The <code>add</code> method of the <code>options_description</code>
class can be used to further group the options:
<programlisting>
po::options_description cmdline_options;
cmdline_options.add(generic).add(config).add(hidden);
po::options_description config_file_options;
config_file_options.add(config).add(hidden);
po::options_description visible("Allowed options");
visible.add(generic).add(config);
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>The parsing and storing of values follows the usual pattern, except that
we additionally call <functionname>parse_config_file</functionname>, and
call the &store; function twice. But what
happens if the same value is specified both on the command line and in
config file? Usually, the value stored first is preferred. This is what
happens for the "--optimization" option. For "composing" options, like
"include-file", the values are merged.
</para>
<para>Here's an example session:
<screen>
$ <userinput>bin/gcc/debug/multiple_sources</userinput>
Include paths are: /opt
Optimization level is 1
$ <userinput>bin/gcc/debug/multiple_sources --help</userinput>
Allows options:
Generic options:
-v [ --version ] : print version string
--help : produce help message
Configuration:
--optimization n : optimization level
-I [ --include-path ] path : include path
$ <userinput>bin/gcc/debug/multiple_sources --optimization=4 -I foo a.cpp b.cpp</userinput>
Include paths are: foo /opt
Input files are: a.cpp b.cpp
Optimization level is 4
</screen>
The first invocation uses values from the configuration file. The second
invocation also uses values from command line. As we see, the include
paths on the command line and in the configuration file are merged,
while optimization is taken from the command line.
</para>
</section>
</section>
<!--
Local Variables:
mode: nxml
sgml-indent-data: t
sgml-parent-document: ("program_options.xml" "section")
sgml-set-face: t
End:
-->