Skip to content

feat(github): add ability to react to PR Review Comments in Workflow - #4705

Merged
rekram1-node merged 3 commits into
anomalyco:devfrom
ucirello:dev
Nov 26, 2025
Merged

rekram1-node merged 3 commits into
anomalyco:devfrom
ucirello:dev

Conversation

@ucirello

@ucirello ucirello commented Nov 24, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request adds support for commenting directly on specific code lines in GitHub PR review tabs using the /oc command. Previously, /oc only worked for general issue and PR comments, but now users can comment on specific lines in the "Files" tab and get contextual AI responses.

Partially addresses #2722
Partially addresses #2152

Closes #4720

@ucirello ucirello changed the title DNM DNR FEATURE: add ability to react to PR Review Comments in Github Workflow DNM DNR feat(github): add ability to react to PR Review Comments in Github Workflow Nov 24, 2025
@rekram1-node

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This is a great addition, once it's ready ill review

@ucirello ucirello changed the title DNM DNR feat(github): add ability to react to PR Review Comments in Github Workflow DNM DNR feat(github): add ability to react to PR Review Comments in Workflow Nov 24, 2025
@ucirello

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks @rekram1-node -- let me test this a bit more before marking it as ready for review.

@ucirello
ucirello marked this pull request as ready for review November 25, 2025 03:34
@ucirello ucirello changed the title DNM DNR feat(github): add ability to react to PR Review Comments in Workflow feat(github): add ability to react to PR Review Comments in Workflow Nov 25, 2025
@rekram1-node

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Just a note that the github/index.ts isn't used at all rn as you may have noticed

Rn the cmd/github.ts is being used but later we will kill it and keep it in the separate package

@rekram1-node
rekram1-node merged commit 0ce6496 into anomalyco:dev Nov 26, 2025
rekram1-node added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2025
rekram1-node added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2025
@ucirello

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Just a note that the github/index.ts isn't used at all rn as you may have noticed

Rn the cmd/github.ts is being used but later we will kill it and keep it in the separate package

Yes; I wasn't so sure to be honest, I preferred erroring on the side of trying to be as thorough as I could.

Rwanbt pushed a commit to Rwanbt/unifia that referenced this pull request May 5, 2026
Rwanbt pushed a commit to Rwanbt/unifia that referenced this pull request May 5, 2026
Rwanbt pushed a commit to Rwanbt/unifia that referenced this pull request May 5, 2026
AIALRA-0 pushed a commit to AIALRA-0/opencode-turn-engine that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2026
AIALRA-0 pushed a commit to AIALRA-0/opencode-turn-engine that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2026
AIALRA-0 pushed a commit to AIALRA-0/opencode-turn-engine that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2026
Rwanbt pushed a commit to Rwanbt/unifia that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2026
Rwanbt pushed a commit to Rwanbt/unifia that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2026
Rwanbt pushed a commit to Rwanbt/unifia that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2026
MarsQiu007 referenced this pull request in MarsQiu007/openNovel Jul 31, 2026
MarsQiu007 referenced this pull request in MarsQiu007/openNovel Jul 31, 2026
MarsQiu007 referenced this pull request in MarsQiu007/openNovel Jul 31, 2026
meSingh pushed a commit to meSingh/opencode that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2026
meSingh pushed a commit to meSingh/opencode that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2026
meSingh pushed a commit to meSingh/opencode that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[FEATURE]: add ability to react to Github Workflow Pull Request Comments

3 participants