Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 12, 2024. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 12, 2024. It is now read-only.

Forms validation refactoring #6928

Closed
Closed

Description

@IgorMinar

This is a meta issue for refactoring of forms validation in AngularJS.

We are considering to do this in 1.3, but it might slip.

Related/Sub issues:

Activity

  1. added this to the 1.3.0-beta.5 milestone on Mar 31, 2014
  2. Narretz commented on Mar 31, 2014

    @Narretz
    Contributor

    I jotted down some thoughts about parsers / formatters and validation here: #6740

  3. modified the milestones: , 1.3.0-beta.9 on May 12, 2014
  4. plentz commented on May 28, 2014

    @plentz
    Contributor

    One more thing that I think could go to 1.3: don't "bubble" the validation of the nested form to the parent form (#5037 #5858 #6095)

  5. tbosch commented on Aug 4, 2014

    @tbosch
    Contributor

    This PR should solve most of the problems: #8267 (although it also adds async validators as new feature).

    I quickly went through the list of all open issues that were tagged with component: forms and found the following interesting cases for validation (which are still open):

    Validation issues that we really should fix with the new design:

    Related PRs to think about:

    Related new features to think about:

  6. tbosch commented on Aug 4, 2014

    @tbosch
    Contributor

    Before we close this issue, we should really do this again: go through the list of all open issues that were tagged with component: forms and solve them / verify them.

    Open question: Should be backport the changes (and fixes) to Angular 1.2.x as well? If not, should we leave the issues open for Angular 1.2.x?

  7. Narretz commented on Sep 9, 2014

    @Narretz
    Contributor

    A lot of these have been tackled, but somehow the lists gets longer and longer:

    Bugs:

    Feats:

  8. tbosch commented on Sep 9, 2014

    @tbosch
    Contributor

    @Narretz thanks for the summary!

  9. IgorMinar commented on Oct 2, 2014

    @IgorMinar
    ContributorAuthor

    the remaining issues are #7016 and #8976 - both of these are features not part of the original scope of this change. So I'm closing this meta issue as resolved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions