Skip to content

[pull] master from caolan:master - #1

Open
pull[bot] wants to merge 118 commits into
botverse:masterfrom
caolan:master
Open

pull[bot] wants to merge 118 commits into
botverse:masterfrom
caolan:master

Conversation

@pull

@pull pull Bot commented Apr 6, 2021 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

broofa and others added 30 commits March 2, 2011 18:27
process.binding() is undocumented internal API, and not intended for use
in userland modules.

In this case, it's also unnecessary, since vm.Script is exactly equal to
the old binding('evals').NodeScript.  However, the
process.binding('evals') is gone as of Node 0.11.
utils: do not use internal Node API
Fix markup in README.md
Required to use asynchronous tasks.
The testReady(test) is called before a test function is run with
the same test object that will be handed to the test function.
This allows for decorating the test object with additional
functionality.

For instance, in the case of
http://github.com/dalnefre/tart-nodeunit it enables adding
test.sponsor(...) and test.dispatch(...) without changing nodeunit.
NPM installation instruction updated.
Added optional callback testReady(test).
Ensure all Reporters accept a callback function
Hide optional dependencies from browserify
A little trick to stop tap breaking browserify
Fixing spelling error. Built-in not Build-in
nycdotnet and others added 28 commits September 7, 2016 12:01
…indows

Fixes rendering issue with the Windows console
Allow invoking browser `run()` without options
Explicitly exit out of nodeunit in both success and failure cases
so tap -> glob -> minimatch would not contain  ddos bug
chore: upgrade tap to 10.0.2
Fixes junit reporter throws ReferenceError
JUnit reporter does not output time #275
* blank line
* Add Node.js versions:
  - 10.x (explicit)
  - 8.x
  - 6.14.x
  - 4.9.x (4.9.1)
@pull pull Bot added ⤵️ pull merge-conflict Resolve conflicts manually labels Apr 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⤵️ pull merge-conflict Resolve conflicts manually

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.