Skip to content

no such option: --root-user-action #853

Description

@HKongCC

Description:
Unable to setup-python@v4. Fails on downloading pip packages, was working yesterday, but the same workflow fails today.

Update: Also appears that yesterday it successfully upgraded pip to 24.0 so it had the --root-user-action argument available, but today the upgrade isn't happening and stays on 22.0.4 properly so the --root-user-action argument is throwing an error.

Action version:
setup-python@v4

Platform:

  • Ubuntu
  • macOS
  • Windows

Runner type:

  • Hosted
  • Self-hosted

Tools version:
Python 3.9.13

Repro steps:
Use actions/setup-python@v4, with python version 3.9.13, and x64 architecture

Expected behavior:
Setup python successfully

Actual behavior:
Fails on pip install with the following message
no such option: --root-user-action

Activity

  1. forgingdestiny commented on Apr 25, 2024

    @forgingdestiny

    +1 seeing similar issue on v2 and v4

  2. benterem commented on Apr 25, 2024

    @benterem

    +1 same

  3. nikita-malininn commented on Apr 25, 2024

    @nikita-malininn

    Try to change to Python versions older than 12h ago in actions - https://github.com/actions/python-versions/releases
    (found it spontaneously)
    upd. For example, switch from broken 3.8.10 to 3.8.18 solves the issue.

  4. HKongCC commented on Apr 25, 2024

    @HKongCC
    Author

    Good eye @KodiaqQ , looks like this is the breaking PR for those versions actions/python-versions#259

  5. nikita-malininn commented on Apr 25, 2024

    @nikita-malininn

    Good eye @KodiaqQ , looks like this is the breaking PR for those versions actions/python-versions#259

    Yeah. We've found this PR earlier than a solution with a version switch.

  6. tblom commented on Apr 25, 2024

    @tblom

    Same on v5

  7. forgingdestiny commented on Apr 25, 2024

    @forgingdestiny

    Does anyone know if there will be a new release or something similar to fix? Using a different python version isn't an option for most production builds without going through an upgrade process. 🤔 thinking through alternatives here. the pinned version should prevent this fwiw.

  8. Rjevski commented on Apr 25, 2024

    @Rjevski

    @HKongCC had a quick look and doesn't seem like that's the case unfortunately - I don't see any parameter here that would allow to override it. I temporarily switched my affected projects to use 3.9.19 version which seems unaffected. Obviously hoping that upstream will yank the broken 3.9.13 build so I can roll back my workaround.

  9. v-HarithaVattikuti commented on Apr 25, 2024

    @v-HarithaVattikuti
    Contributor

    Hello @HKongCC
    Thank you for creating this issue. We will investigate it and get back to you as soon as we have some feedback.

  10. aram-eskandari commented on Apr 26, 2024

    @aram-eskandari

    i can confirm what @Rjevski already stated: upgrading from my old version of 3.9.13 to 3.9.19 worked. Whenever this issue is resolved i will revert my project back to 3.9.13.

  11. goharShoukat commented on Apr 26, 2024

    @goharShoukat

    Do we have an ETA on this? Moving Production builds to a newer version is not quite as straightforward!

  12. Rjevski commented on Apr 26, 2024

    @Rjevski

    @goharShoukat you could look into using PyEnv in the meantime? A bit of manual work but should be doable if it's time-critical.

  13. goharShoukat commented on Apr 26, 2024

    @goharShoukat

    @goharShoukat you could look into using PyEnv in the meantime? A bit of manual work but should be doable if it's time-critical.

    How do you mean? PyEnv would only let me switch versions of Python but the code and other packages need to be appropriately adjusted if I switch over to a different python version.

  14. Rjevski commented on Apr 26, 2024

    @Rjevski

    @goharShoukat I meant use PyEnv to install 3.9.13 instead of using the GH Actions' broken build. Effectively remove your "setup-python" action and just install & call pyenv like you would on any other Linux machine.

  15. v-priya-kinthali commented on Apr 26, 2024

    @v-priya-kinthali
    Contributor

    Hello @HKongCC ,
    Could you please provide a link to a minimal reproduction of the issue/workflow steps? It would be very helpful in addressing your problem. Thank you!

  16. sikander27 commented on Apr 26, 2024

    @sikander27

    +1, facing same issue and looks like this actions/python-versions@29394d0 PR break it :(

  17. cognifloyd commented on Apr 26, 2024

    @cognifloyd

    Looks like the --root-user-action arg was added in actions/python-versions#223 (actions/python-versions@b539ede), and then it was removed for macos runners in actions/python-versions#259 (actions/python-versions@29394d0), but it is still present for the linux runners.

    I'm seeing this failure on ubuntu-20.04:

      Version 3.8.10 was not found in the local cache
      Version 3.8.10 is available for downloading
      Download from "https://github.com/actions/python-versions/releases/download/3.8.10-8833490298/python-3.8.10-linux-20.04-x64.tar.gz"
      Extract downloaded archive
      /usr/bin/tar xz --warning=no-unknown-keyword --overwrite -C /home/runner/work/_temp/2f150651-7ec7-4a06-b868-a38da9fd2828 -f /home/runner/work/_temp/9035f184-4c44-46b2-bda5-30215c62bd33
      Execute installation script
      Check if Python hostedtoolcache folder exist...
      Create Python 3.8.10 folder
      Copy Python binaries to hostedtoolcache folder
      Create additional symlinks (Required for the UsePythonVersion Azure Pipelines task and the setup-python GitHub Action)
      Upgrading pip...
      Looking in links: /tmp/tmp1b6088ml
      Requirement already satisfied: setuptools in /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.8.10/x64/lib/python3.8/site-packages (56.0.0)
      Requirement already satisfied: pip in /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.8.10/x64/lib/python3.8/site-packages (21.1.1)
      Error: Usage:   
        /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.8.10/x64/bin/python -m pip install [options] <requirement specifier> [package-index-options] ...
        /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.8.10/x64/bin/python -m pip install [options] -r <requirements file> [package-index-options] ...
        /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.8.10/x64/bin/python -m pip install [options] [-e] <vcs project url> ...
        /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.8.10/x64/bin/python -m pip install [options] [-e] <local project path> ...
        /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.8.10/x64/bin/python -m pip install [options] <archive url/path> ...
      
      no such option: --root-user-action
      Error: The process '/usr/bin/bash' failed with exit code 2
    

    So, this build of python 3.8.10 has pip 21.1.1, but the --root-user-action option was added in pypa/pip#11035 (pypa/pip@2e1112a) which was only released in pip 22.1 and greater.

    Where is the version of pip embedded in the python-version build defined? Either the python build needs a newer version of pip, or the linux script needs to use the env var similar to the macos fix.

  18. mayeut commented on Apr 26, 2024

    @mayeut
    Contributor

    I only expected missing macOS arm64 versions to be added when opening actions/python-versions#259

    It seems that rather than adding the missing platform, every platform was rebuilt and published...

    Where is the version of pip embedded in the python-version build defined?

    The initial version comes from the python sources/binaries (built or fetched depending on OS/platform). It's tightly coupled to the version of python.

    Either the python build needs a newer version of pip, or the linux script needs to use the env var similar to the macos fix.

    I do have a PR on the way to fix that on every platform, it will need the maintainers to approve it & rebuild everything once again.

  19. Keshapally commented on Apr 29, 2024

    @Keshapally

    +1

  20. cognifloyd commented on Apr 29, 2024

    @cognifloyd

    With the latest build of python 3.8.10, I'm no longer seeing this issue. Thanks for fixing it @mayeut.

  21. v-aparnajyothi-y commented on Apr 30, 2024

    @v-aparnajyothi-y
    Contributor

    Hello Everyone, New artifacts have been generated. Please rerun the actions and let us know if you still see any issues.
    Thank you @mayeut for your contribution with the PR.

  22. goharShoukat commented on Apr 30, 2024

    @goharShoukat

    Hello Everyone, New artifacts have been generated. Please rerun the actions and let us know if you still see any issues. Thank you @mayeut for your contribution with the PR.

    Works for me! Thanks for the quick fix!

  23. v-aparnajyothi-y commented on May 15, 2024

    @v-aparnajyothi-y
    Contributor

    Hello @HKongCC, We are closing this issue as it is fixed and confirmed by everyone.
    Please feel free to reach us if you are still facing the same issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

bugSomething isn't working

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions