Build support for Haiku operating system#3
Closed
kenmays wants to merge 74 commits into
Closed
Conversation
There is a problem with trying to inline this function. De-inline it for now. To be reverted when we find the problem?
Several fixes and cleanups to the way we handle include paths. It gets us closer to how it's done on other platforms. Also some rework of ImageBufferBackend constructor.
Main changes in this commit:
- BUrlProtocolHandler is splitted into two classes:
- BUrlProtocolHandler for managing the request lifetime.
- BUrlRequestWrapper for handling events from requests spawned by
BUrlProtocolHandler.
The separation allow the events handling code to be greatly
simplified, and code for handling events and managing request
are now properly separated.
In the future this enables BUrlProtocolHandler to be the
synchronization/serialization point, allowing BUrlRequestWrapper to
interface with BUrlRequest directly instead of going through
BUrlProtocolAsynchronousRequest, which should allow for better
performance.
- Redirection and authentication are now handled manually by the backend
instead of delegating to BUrlRequest.
- Code style has been adjusted to match WebKit official style guideline.
Adding namespaces as needed.
Several fixes to includes in WebKitLegacy since include path management in webkit was changed.
Default value set depending on current document background color. Can be forced on or off with a new API in BWebView.
We use our own IPC (BMessage-based) instead.
- Remove files that don't exist anymore - Some fixes to properly manage include files
WebKit-Jenner
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
[JSC] ObjectAllocationSinking should not omit phi insertion when pointer follows to the same value
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279570
rdar://135851156
Reviewed by Keith Miller.
Let's consider the following FTL graph.
BB#0
@0 = NewObject()
Jump #1
BB#1
PutByOffset(@0, 0, @x)
Jump #2
BB#2
...
@z = ...
@1 = GetByOffset(@x, 0)
Branch(@1, #3, #4)
BB#3
PutByOffset(@0, 0, @z)
Jump #5
BB#4
PutByOffset(@0, 0, @z)
Jump #5
BB#5
Jump #2
Now, we would like to eliminate @0 object allocation. And we are
computing SSA for pointers of fields of the that object which gets
eliminated. Consider about @x's fields' SSA. PutByOffset becomes Def
and GetByOffset becomes Use. And the same field will get the same SSA
variable. So we first puts Defs and compute Phis based on that.
In ObjectAllocationSinking phase, we had a fast path when the both SSA
variable is following to the same value. Let's see BB#5. Because BB#3
and BB#4 defines Defs, dominance frontier BB#5 will need to introduce
Phi. But interestingly, both SSA variable is following to the same @z.
As a result, we were not inserting Phi for this case.
But this is wrong. Inserted Phi is a Def, and based on that, we will
further introduce Phis with that. If we omit inserting Phi in BB#5,
we will not insert Phi into BB#2 while BB#2 will merge BB#1's Def And
BB#5's Phi's Def. As a result, in BB#2, we think this variable is
following to BB#1's Def. But that's wrong and BB#5's Phi exists.
This patch removes this fast path to fix the issue.
* JSTests/stress/object-allocation-sinking-phi-insertion-for-pointers.js: Added.
(Queue):
(Queue.prototype.enqueue):
(Queue.prototype.dequeue):
(i.queue.dequeue):
* Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGObjectAllocationSinkingPhase.cpp:
Canonical link: https://commits.webkit.org/283558@main
Canonical link: https://commits.webkit.org/280938.337@safari-7619-branch
WebKit-Jenner
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2025
…pector rdar://98891055 https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283092 Reviewed by Ryosuke Niwa and BJ Burg. There currently exists a message WebInspectorUIProxy::OpenLocalInspectorFrontend, which the web process sends to the UI process to show Web Inspector for the current web page. This introduces security risks as a compromised website may find its way to send arbitrary messages to the UI process, opening Web Inspector and weakening the web content sandbox. The reason this message exists is because there are useful ways the web process needs to open Web Inspector with initiative. Normally, Web Inspector is opened via one of the Develop menu's items, which is controlled by the UI process. However, Web Inspector can also be opened without being prompted by the UI process first, in these places: 1. In a web page's context menu, the "Inspect Element" option 2. Inside Web Inspector, if the Debug UI is enabled, on the top right corner, a button to open inspector^2 3. In WebKitTestRunner, via the TestRunner::showWebInspector function This patch makes it so that web process can no longer send a message to a UI process to open Web Inspector. This means web process cannot open Web Inspector at will -- it must be either due to the UI process's demand, or it's in one of the above three cases. More details below. I have tested that this change preserves the above three special cases and does prevent the web page from opening Web Inspector at will. - Cases #1 and #2 can be tested from the UI. - Case #3 can be tested with a WebKit test involving Web Inspector. I ran the test LayoutTests/inspector/console/js-completions.html, where I saw the test crashing without special treatment for this case. - To verify that the web page can't open Web Inspector, I followed the reproduction steps from the Radar and saw Web Inspector no longer opens, and opening the external URL also failed as expected. * Source/WebKit/UIProcess/Inspector/WebInspectorUIProxy.messages.in: * Source/WebKit/UIProcess/Inspector/WebInspectorUIProxy.h: * Source/WebKit/UIProcess/Inspector/WebInspectorUIProxy.cpp: (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::connect): - If the UI process wants to open Web Inspector, it sends a WebInspector::Show command to the web process. This patch makes that command take an async reply, so that the anticipated WebInspectorUIProxy::OpenLocalInspectorFrontend message from the web process can now be delivered through that async reply instead. This ensures that OpenLocalInspectorFrontend can only be done when initiated from the UI process (due to user interaction). (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::markAsUnderTest): (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::openLocalInspectorFrontend): (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::closeFrontendPageAndWindow): - To avoid relying on the web process for potentially sensitive parameters, I reworked and removed the canAttach and underTest arguments from openLocalInspectorFrontend. These two values are now stored and managed in the UI process instead, instead of being passed from the web process all the time. - For canAttach, I noticed that the WebInspectorUIProxyMac::platformCanAttach method already implements the same logic as the web process's WebInspector::canAttachWindow. I filed https://webkit.org/b/283435 as a follow-up to clean up the webProcessCanAttach parameter, the canAttachWindow function in the web process, and potentially the m_attached field too, which all become obsolete due to this change. - I couldn't figure out what the `if (m_attached)` in canAttachWindow check does, and to me it had no effect, as this function is not called while inspector is open. - For underTest, I'm now letting the test runner directly set the flag on the WebInspectorUIProxy, as part of my fix to address case #3 from above. (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::showConsole): (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::showResources): (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::showMainResourceForFrame): (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::togglePageProfiling): - As the web process can longer call OpenLocalInspectorFrontend, call show/connect/openLocalInspectorFrontend here in the UI process instead. (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::requestOpenLocalInspectorFrontend): - To preserve the open inspector^2 button (case #2 from above), we still maintain this message, but we ignore it unless it's for opening inspector^2, thus renaming the message as a request. This is all assuming that the Web Inspector is not a compromised web process, so we allow that message from it to come through. * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Inspector/WebInspector.messages.in: * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Inspector/WebInspector.h: * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Inspector/WebInspector.cpp: (WebKit::WebInspector::show): - The Show message now takes an async reply, which is used to replace sending WebInspectorUIProxy::OpenLocalInspectorFrontend later. (WebKit::WebInspector::showConsole): (WebKit::WebInspector::showResources): (WebKit::WebInspector::showMainResourceForFrame): (WebKit::WebInspector::startPageProfiling): (WebKit::WebInspector::stopPageProfiling): - Calling inspectorController()->show() no longer does anything, since it's now the UI process's job to show Web Inspector first, for these functions to merely switch to the appropriate tabs. * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Inspector/WebInspector.cpp: (WebKit::WebInspector::openLocalInspectorFrontend): * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Inspector/WebInspectorClient.cpp: (WebKit::WebInspectorClient::openLocalFrontend): - Adapt to the command's reworked version. - This is maintained to allow the opening of inspector^2 from the web process (case #2 from above). For opening inspector^1, this message will be ignored by the UI process. * Source/WebKit/UIProcess/WebPageProxy.cpp: (WebKit::WebPageProxy::contextMenuItemSelected): - When the "Inspect Element" context menu item is selected (case #1 from above), since the web process may not be privileged to open Web Inspector, handle the showing of inspector here in UI process. * Tools/WebKitTestRunner/InjectedBundle/TestRunner.cpp: (WTR::TestRunner::showWebInspector): * Tools/WebKitTestRunner/TestInvocation.cpp: (WTR::TestInvocation::didReceiveMessageFromInjectedBundle): * Source/WebKit/UIProcess/API/C/WKPagePrivate.h: * Source/WebKit/UIProcess/API/C/WKPage.cpp: (WKPageShowWebInspectorForTesting): - Preserve letting the WebKitTestRunner open Web Inspector (case #3 from above). - Adapt to the change that we now also let the UI process know about the underTest flag for case #3, rather than letting UI process rely on the value reported by the web process. * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/InjectedBundle/API/c/WKBundlePage.h: * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/InjectedBundle/API/c/WKBundlePage.cpp: (WKBundlePageShowInspectorForTest): Deleted. - No longer used due to my special fix for case #3. Canonical link: https://commits.webkit.org/283286.537@safari-7620-branch
philn
added a commit
to philn/WebKit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2025
Reviewed by NOBODY (OOPS!).
This was spotted by ASan, the real and imaginary AudioFloatArrays end-up using aligned_alloc() for
their storage, which expects a power-of-two size. Using fftSize / 2 + 1 makes the size
non-power-of-two, the full fftSize being power-of-two (we now have an ASSERT for this).
==1733723==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000000 (pc 0x7fc75c438bca bp 0x7ffed612c860 sp 0x7ffed612c028 T0)
==1733723==The signal is caused by a WRITE memory access.
==1733723==Hint: address points to the zero page.
#0 0x7fc75c438bca in __memset_avx2_unaligned_erms (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x16dbca) (BuildId: 77c77fee058b19c6f001cf2cb0371ce3b8341211)
WebKit#1 0x2fc4ce in __asan_memset (/var/home/phil/WebKit/local-build-gtk/WebKitBuild/GTK/Release/bin/WebKitWebProcess+0x2fc4ce) (BuildId: e2b0aff0c8fcab48026d63cf711cd70d0aeceb79)
WebKit#2 0x7fc77047599e in WebCore::FFTFrame::FFTFrame(unsigned int) UnifiedSource-3c72abbe-20.cpp
WebKit#3 0x7fc76d41c08b in WebCore::PeriodicWave::createBandLimitedTables(float const*, float const*, unsigned int, WebCore::ShouldDisableNormalization) UnifiedSource-f8afad56-52.cpp
WebKit#4 0x7fc76d41f371 in WebCore::PeriodicWave::generateBasicWaveform(WebCore::PeriodicWave::Type) UnifiedSource-f8afad56-52.cpp
WebKit#5 0x7fc76d41e633 in WebCore::PeriodicWave::createSine(float) UnifiedSource-f8afad56-52.cpp
WebKit#6 0x7fc76d3c2352 in WebCore::BaseAudioContext::periodicWave(WebCore::OscillatorType) UnifiedSource-f8afad56-49.cpp
WebKit#7 0x7fc76d410dbf in WebCore::OscillatorNode::setTypeForBindings(WebCore::OscillatorType) UnifiedSource-f8afad56-52.cpp
WebKit#8 0x7fc76d4102f4 in WebCore::OscillatorNode::create(WebCore::BaseAudioContext&, WebCore::OscillatorOptions const&) UnifiedSource-f8afad56-52.cpp
WebKit#9 0x7fc76d3bc210 in WebCore::BaseAudioContext::createOscillator() UnifiedSource-f8afad56-49.cpp
WebKit#10 0x7fc76acbc743 in WebCore::jsBaseAudioContextPrototypeFunction_createOscillator(JSC::JSGlobalObject*, JSC::CallFrame*) UnifiedSource-3a52ce78-11.cpp
WebKit#11 0x7fc705c10037 (<unknown module>)
* Source/WebCore/platform/audio/gstreamer/FFTFrameGStreamer.cpp:
(WebCore::FFTFrame::FFTFrame):
webkit-commit-queue
pushed a commit
to JonWBedard/WebKit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2025
…pector rdar://98891055 https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283092 Reviewed by Ryosuke Niwa and BJ Burg. There currently exists a message WebInspectorUIProxy::OpenLocalInspectorFrontend, which the web process sends to the UI process to show Web Inspector for the current web page. This introduces security risks as a compromised website may find its way to send arbitrary messages to the UI process, opening Web Inspector and weakening the web content sandbox. The reason this message exists is because there are useful ways the web process needs to open Web Inspector with initiative. Normally, Web Inspector is opened via one of the Develop menu's items, which is controlled by the UI process. However, Web Inspector can also be opened without being prompted by the UI process first, in these places: 1. In a web page's context menu, the "Inspect Element" option 2. Inside Web Inspector, if the Debug UI is enabled, on the top right corner, a button to open inspector^2 3. In WebKitTestRunner, via the TestRunner::showWebInspector function This patch makes it so that web process can no longer send a message to a UI process to open Web Inspector. This means web process cannot open Web Inspector at will -- it must be either due to the UI process's demand, or it's in one of the above three cases. More details below. I have tested that this change preserves the above three special cases and does prevent the web page from opening Web Inspector at will. - Cases WebKit#1 and WebKit#2 can be tested from the UI. - Case WebKit#3 can be tested with a WebKit test involving Web Inspector. I ran the test LayoutTests/inspector/console/js-completions.html, where I saw the test crashing without special treatment for this case. - To verify that the web page can't open Web Inspector, I followed the reproduction steps from the Radar and saw Web Inspector no longer opens, and opening the external URL also failed as expected. * Source/WebKit/UIProcess/Inspector/WebInspectorUIProxy.messages.in: * Source/WebKit/UIProcess/Inspector/WebInspectorUIProxy.h: * Source/WebKit/UIProcess/Inspector/WebInspectorUIProxy.cpp: (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::connect): - If the UI process wants to open Web Inspector, it sends a WebInspector::Show command to the web process. This patch makes that command take an async reply, so that the anticipated WebInspectorUIProxy::OpenLocalInspectorFrontend message from the web process can now be delivered through that async reply instead. This ensures that OpenLocalInspectorFrontend can only be done when initiated from the UI process (due to user interaction). (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::markAsUnderTest): (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::openLocalInspectorFrontend): (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::closeFrontendPageAndWindow): - To avoid relying on the web process for potentially sensitive parameters, I reworked and removed the canAttach and underTest arguments from openLocalInspectorFrontend. These two values are now stored and managed in the UI process instead, instead of being passed from the web process all the time. - For canAttach, I noticed that the WebInspectorUIProxyMac::platformCanAttach method already implements the same logic as the web process's WebInspector::canAttachWindow. I filed https://webkit.org/b/283435 as a follow-up to clean up the webProcessCanAttach parameter, the canAttachWindow function in the web process, and potentially the m_attached field too, which all become obsolete due to this change. - I couldn't figure out what the `if (m_attached)` in canAttachWindow check does, and to me it had no effect, as this function is not called while inspector is open. - For underTest, I'm now letting the test runner directly set the flag on the WebInspectorUIProxy, as part of my fix to address case WebKit#3 from above. (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::showConsole): (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::showResources): (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::showMainResourceForFrame): (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::togglePageProfiling): - As the web process can longer call OpenLocalInspectorFrontend, call show/connect/openLocalInspectorFrontend here in the UI process instead. (WebKit::WebInspectorUIProxy::requestOpenLocalInspectorFrontend): - To preserve the open inspector^2 button (case WebKit#2 from above), we still maintain this message, but we ignore it unless it's for opening inspector^2, thus renaming the message as a request. This is all assuming that the Web Inspector is not a compromised web process, so we allow that message from it to come through. * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Inspector/WebInspector.messages.in: * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Inspector/WebInspector.h: * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Inspector/WebInspector.cpp: (WebKit::WebInspector::show): - The Show message now takes an async reply, which is used to replace sending WebInspectorUIProxy::OpenLocalInspectorFrontend later. (WebKit::WebInspector::showConsole): (WebKit::WebInspector::showResources): (WebKit::WebInspector::showMainResourceForFrame): (WebKit::WebInspector::startPageProfiling): (WebKit::WebInspector::stopPageProfiling): - Calling inspectorController()->show() no longer does anything, since it's now the UI process's job to show Web Inspector first, for these functions to merely switch to the appropriate tabs. * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Inspector/WebInspector.cpp: (WebKit::WebInspector::openLocalInspectorFrontend): * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Inspector/WebInspectorClient.cpp: (WebKit::WebInspectorClient::openLocalFrontend): - Adapt to the command's reworked version. - This is maintained to allow the opening of inspector^2 from the web process (case WebKit#2 from above). For opening inspector^1, this message will be ignored by the UI process. * Source/WebKit/UIProcess/WebPageProxy.cpp: (WebKit::WebPageProxy::contextMenuItemSelected): - When the "Inspect Element" context menu item is selected (case WebKit#1 from above), since the web process may not be privileged to open Web Inspector, handle the showing of inspector here in UI process. * Tools/WebKitTestRunner/InjectedBundle/TestRunner.cpp: (WTR::TestRunner::showWebInspector): * Tools/WebKitTestRunner/TestInvocation.cpp: (WTR::TestInvocation::didReceiveMessageFromInjectedBundle): * Source/WebKit/UIProcess/API/C/WKPagePrivate.h: * Source/WebKit/UIProcess/API/C/WKPage.cpp: (WKPageShowWebInspectorForTesting): - Preserve letting the WebKitTestRunner open Web Inspector (case WebKit#3 from above). - Adapt to the change that we now also let the UI process know about the underTest flag for case WebKit#3, rather than letting UI process rely on the value reported by the web process. * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/InjectedBundle/API/c/WKBundlePage.h: * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/InjectedBundle/API/c/WKBundlePage.cpp: (WKBundlePageShowInspectorForTest): Deleted. - No longer used due to my special fix for case WebKit#3. Originally-landed-as: 283286.537@safari-7620-branch (694a9b5). rdar://144667626 Canonical link: https://commits.webkit.org/290260@main
webkit-commit-queue
pushed a commit
to rcaliman-apple/WebKit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2025
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264576 rdar://114997939 Reviewed by BJ Burg. (This work was done in collaboration with Razvan and was based on his draft at WebKit@377f3e1.) This commit enables automatically inspecting and pausing the ServiceWorkerDebuggable. The idea is similar to the same functionalities with the JSContext/JSGlobalObjectDebuggable. The general flow is: 1. When the debuggable is first created, we optionally mark it as inspectable. 2. As soon as the debuggable is marked inspectable, its main thread (the thread that it was created on) gets blocked. 3. When the auto-launched Web Inspector frontend finishes initializing, it notifies the backend. - It's important for the debuggable to wait for this signal because a genuine auto-inspection must appear attached to the debuggable before it begins execution, respecting any breakpoints set early on in its script (where auto-pausing is basically a breakpoint before line 1). 4. The backend unpauses the blocked debuggable. If auto-pausing was requested, tell the debugger agent to pause. The service worker begins executing script unless its worker thread was specified to start in the WorkerThreadStartMode::WaitForInspector. During that waiting period, the worker thread can perform tasks sent into its debugging run loop, until it's signaled to stop waiting and continue to execute the script like normal. This commit makes use of that interface to make the service worker pause (when justified, i.e. developerExtrasEnabled) before running the above flow resembling auto-inspecting a JSContext. * Source/WebCore/workers/service/context/ServiceWorkerThread.cpp: (WebCore::threadStartModeFromSettings): (WebCore::ServiceWorkerThread::ServiceWorkerThread): - When there is potentially a remote inspector that would like to auto-inspect, make it so that the thread waits on start before executing its script. * Source/WebCore/workers/service/context/ServiceWorkerThreadProxy.h: * Source/WebCore/workers/service/context/ServiceWorkerThreadProxy.cpp: (WebCore::ServiceWorkerThreadProxy::ServiceWorkerThreadProxy): (WebCore::ServiceWorkerThreadProxy::threadStartedRunningDebuggerTasks): - Setting inspectability is step WebKit#1 in the above flow. - In step WebKit#2, calling `debuggable->setInspectable(true)` might block already, but we don't want that until the worker thread is setup and have the run loop be in debug mode, so we do that in a callback instead. - In step WebKit#4, when connection to the inspector completes or fails, the setInspectable call only returns then, so we unblock the worker thread to resume code execution. * Source/WebCore/inspector/agents/worker/WorkerDebuggerAgent.h: * Source/WebCore/inspector/WorkerInspectorController.h: * Source/WebCore/inspector/WorkerInspectorController.cpp: (WebCore::WorkerInspectorController::frontendInitialized): (WebCore::WorkerInspectorController::connectFrontend): (WebCore::WorkerInspectorController::disconnectFrontend): (WebCore::WorkerInspectorController::createLazyAgents): (WebCore::WorkerInspectorController::ensureDebuggerAgent): * Source/WebCore/workers/service/context/ServiceWorkerDebuggable.cpp: (WebCore::ServiceWorkerDebuggable::connect): * Source/WebCore/workers/service/context/ServiceWorkerInspectorProxy.h: * Source/WebCore/workers/service/context/ServiceWorkerInspectorProxy.cpp: (WebCore::ServiceWorkerInspectorProxy::connectToWorker): - Mimic the logic for auto-inspecting a JSContext/JSGlobalObjectDebuggable. * Source/JavaScriptCore/inspector/protocol/Inspector.json: - Step WebKit#3 in the above flow, notify the backend when frontend completes setting up. * Source/WebCore/workers/service/context/ServiceWorkerDebuggable.h: - Allow service workers to be auto-inspected. (This is checked at https://github.com/rcaliman-apple/WebKit/blob/eng/Web-Inspector-Automatically-connect-Web-Inspector-to-ServiceWorker/Source/JavaScriptCore/inspector/remote/RemoteInspectionTarget.cpp#L95) * Source/WTF/wtf/PlatformEnableCocoa.h: - Add feature flag just in case. Canonical link: https://commits.webkit.org/291167@main
webkit-commit-queue
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2025
…n addFloatsToNewParent https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290898 <rdar://143296265> Reviewed by Antti Koivisto. In this patch 1. we let m_floatingObjects go stale on the skipped root (we already do that for the skipped subtree by not running layout) 2. we descend into skipped subtrees while cleaning up floats even when m_floatingObjects is stale/empty Having up-to-date m_floatingObjects on the skipped root, while stale m_floatingObjects on the skipped subtree can lead to issues when (#1) a previously intrusive float (#2) becomes non-intrusive and (#3) eventually gets deleted prevents us from being able to cleanup m_floatingObjects in skipped subtree(s). at #1 m_floatingObjects is populated with the intrusive float (both skipped root and renderers in skipped subtree) and at #2 since we only run layout on the skipped root, m_floatingObjects gets updated by removing this previously intrusive float (skipped subtree becomes stale) and at #3 we don't descend into the skipped subtree to cleanup m_floatingObjects since the skipped root does not have this float anymore (removed at #2). * Source/WebCore/rendering/RenderBlockFlow.cpp: (WebCore::RenderBlockFlow::markSiblingsWithFloatsForLayout): Canonical link: https://commits.webkit.org/293119@main
webkit-commit-queue
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2025
…n addFloatsToNewParent https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290898 <rdar://149579273> Reviewed by Antti Koivisto. In this patch 1. we let m_floatingObjects go stale on the skipped root (we already do that for the skipped subtree by not running layout) 2. we descend into skipped subtrees while cleaning up floats even when m_floatingObjects is stale/empty Having up-to-date m_floatingObjects on the skipped root, while stale m_floatingObjects on the skipped subtree can lead to issues when (#1) a previously intrusive float (#2) becomes non-intrusive and (#3) eventually gets deleted prevents us from being able to cleanup m_floatingObjects in skipped subtree(s). at #1 m_floatingObjects is populated with the intrusive float (both skipped root and renderers in skipped subtree) and at #2 since we only run layout on the skipped root, m_floatingObjects gets updated by removing this previously intrusive float (skipped subtree becomes stale) and at #3 we don't descend into the skipped subtree to cleanup m_floatingObjects since the skipped root does not have this float anymore (removed at #2). * Source/WebCore/rendering/RenderBlockFlow.cpp: (WebCore::RenderBlockFlow::markSiblingsWithFloatsForLayout): Canonical link: https://commits.webkit.org/293889@main
webkit-commit-queue
pushed a commit
to JonWBedard/WebKit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2025
…:Settings' rdar://151332172 Unreviewed build fix. * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Model/ModelProcessModelPlayer.cpp: Canonical link: https://commits.webkit.org/294933@main
webkit-commit-queue
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2025
…eleted and re-entered into an input https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=294558 <rdar://problem/154094432> Reviewed by Antti Koivisto. 1. RenderTextControlSingleLine's inner renderer is vertically centered. 2. RenderTextControlSingleLine's inner renderer provides the baseline position for the input box. 3. The baseline position is passed to inline layout and is used to align other content on the line (when baseline alignment applies). As text is appended to the input box: 1. An empty RenderText is constructed and inserted into the tree. 2. InsertIntoTextNodeCommand::doApply() is called. 3. RenderText is populated by calling setText. In step #2, layout is prematurely run on the content (see passwordEchoEnabled) before it is populated in step #3. This layout generates an empty inline display content with a 0px-tall line box, which gets vertically centered. This "centered line" then becomes the baseline for the rest of the content. In step #3, another layout is run on the input box, this time with populated content, but the layout is limited to the input only, so adjacent content does not get alignment treatment. This is how the offset occurs (result of the premature layout). There are a few issues here: 1. We should not run layout on the empty content before RenderText is populated (webkit.org/b/294880). 2. RenderTextControlSingleLine should not center the inner renderer when it has no content (webkit.org/b/294881). 3. IFC should not report valid line boxes when there’s no content at all (i.e., when no display boxes are generated). This patch addresses issue #3. * LayoutTests/fast/editing/incorrect-baseline-for-input-adjacent-content-expected.html: Added. * LayoutTests/fast/editing/incorrect-baseline-for-input-adjacent-content.html: Added. * Source/WebCore/layout/integration/inline/LayoutIntegrationLineLayout.cpp: (WebCore::LayoutIntegration::LineLayout::firstLineBox const): (WebCore::LayoutIntegration::LineLayout::lastLineBox const): Canonical link: https://commits.webkit.org/296569@main
webkit-commit-queue
pushed a commit
to Constellation/WebKit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2025
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299504 rdar://161294228 Reviewed by Yijia Huang. Previous one 300327@main worked for the same basic block's load, but it didn't work for the load in dominators. This patch updates CSE rules to make immutable load elimination work with dominators' load. Like, BB#0 @0: Load(@x, immutable) @1: CCall(...) # potentially clobber everything Branch ... WebKit#1, WebKit#2 BB#1 @2: CCall(...) # potentially clobber everything Jump WebKit#3 BB#2 @3: CCall(...) # potentially clobber everything Jump WebKit#3 BB#3 @4: Load(@x, immutable) ... Then @4 should be replaced with Identity(@0) as dominator BB#0 is having immutable load @0 matching to @4. Tests: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3_1.cpp Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3_8.cpp * Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/B3EliminateCommonSubexpressions.cpp: * Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.h: * Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3_1.cpp: (run): * Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3_8.cpp: (testLoadImmutableDominated): (testLoadImmutableNonDominated): Canonical link: https://commits.webkit.org/300562@main
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.