-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 459
test: Added regression test for BitWriter / BitReader bool size inconsistency #561
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
df8e587
test: Added regression test for BitWriter / BitReader bool size incon…
TwoTenPvP 423a915
Merge branch 'develop' into test/regression-write-object-packed-bool
0xFA11 7a6e698
Merge branch 'develop' into test/regression-write-object-packed-bool
TwoTenPvP f8d5963
refactor: changed to var
TwoTenPvP 7654332
refactor: Fixed class name
TwoTenPvP File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion
2
...mlapi/Tests/Editor/BitStreamTests.cs.meta → ...i/Tests/Editor/NetworkBufferTests.cs.meta
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you might add other flavors of types here such as
int[],INetworkSerializable,Vector3etc to test a few other things too.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this PR is just for the regression of the bool bug though. But I will test all the packed ones.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what about
bool[]then? :)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah, also Yamato fails because fix #541 went into
release/0.1.0and it's not ondevelopbranch yet. so the test fails, which is very good! (except 2021.1 on Win passed? oh no...)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://yamato.cds.internal.unity3d.com/jobs/1201-Unity%20MLAPI/tree/test%252Fregression-write-object-packed-bool/.yamato%252Fproject-test.yml%2523test_project_com.unity.multiplayer.mlapi_ubuntu_trunk/5704466/job/full-pipeline
Looks failed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And yes, I put int he PR description: "Expect this to fail until the fix for this has been backported to develop."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea as for yamato. The tests failed on all machine. But pack and validate succeeded. Which is a good sign!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mattwalsh-unity was talking about merging
release/0.1.0back intodevelopsome time soon. maybe we should that first and merge this in right afterwards?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure