-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
MIT License can't have "all rights reserved." #2129
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
Area-Maintainers-Documentationspecific to documentation in this repospecific to documentation in this repoIssue-Discussionthe issue may not have a clear classification yet. The issue may generate an RFC or may be reclassifthe issue may not have a clear classification yet. The issue may generate an RFC or may be reclassifResolution-Won't FixThe issue won't be fixed, possibly due to compatibility reason.The issue won't be fixed, possibly due to compatibility reason.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Area-Maintainers-Documentationspecific to documentation in this repospecific to documentation in this repoIssue-Discussionthe issue may not have a clear classification yet. The issue may generate an RFC or may be reclassifthe issue may not have a clear classification yet. The issue may generate an RFC or may be reclassifResolution-Won't FixThe issue won't be fixed, possibly due to compatibility reason.The issue won't be fixed, possibly due to compatibility reason.
According to
README.md, PowerShell is licensed under the MIT License. However, when I openLICENSE.txtI see the following:How can all rights be reserved while granting all the rights under the MIT License? To reserve all rights while granting all the rights under the MIT license is completely contradictory. Of course, Microsoft can retain the copyright but it can't reserve all rights and license under MIT.
Credit: I did not discover this issue. It was discussed on episode 480 of the Windows Weekly podcast. The license-specific discussion (including this issue) is between about 11m:45s and about 13m:05s.