Skip to content

Require owner review and clarify MIT licensing - #5

Merged
jesseoue merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/owner-review-and-licenses
Sep 7, 2026
Merged

jesseoue merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/owner-review-and-licenses

Conversation

@jesseoue

@jesseoue jesseoue commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Assign all files, including ownership and workflow configuration, to @jesseoue for review. Preserve the existing MIT license and copyright notices, explain third-party licensing obligations, and separate permission to reuse a copy from permission to change the canonical repository. The organization-profile repository gains the missing standard MIT license.

Where applicable, pin workflow actions, remove unnecessary bot write access, and require the maintainer-controlled release environment before publication. Release references must belong to reviewed main history. Validation workflows run for every PR so required checks cannot be omitted by path filters.

Validation: ownership/license/public-file checks, n8n package contents, and generated GTM artifacts checked locally. No releases or paid API calls. GitHub protection settings are applied separately after these policy files are merged.

@jesseoue
jesseoue merged commit fc7a0cb into main Sep 7, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant