Repository navigation
docs(research): margin 路径已由决策 1A 采用 (#41) - #294
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The conclusion still called the side-by-side path a candidate; decision 1A adopted it, while the native CHAR_INFO gap stays a known difference.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
内容
docs/research/conpty-margin-backends.md的开头结论原本写：决策 1A 已确认采用该路径作为 R2 产品后端，故改为：
为什么
文档仍停留在"决策前"的措辞，会让读者以为这条路还在评估中。同时必须保留后半句：本记录只证明 VT 呈现正确，原生
CHAR_INFO的缺口是已知差异，不是已修复。边界
Refs #41 #47