docs: document Oracle-compatible LISTAGG#1443
Conversation
Assisted-by: OpenAI:gpt-5
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 59 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Thanks for you work. Please refer to the previous comments. |
2 participants
Summary
LISTAGGformsFILTERexamplesDISTINCT, inlineORDER BY, andON OVERFLOWsyntaxFixes #1433
Verification
make -C doc/src/sgml checkmake -C doc/src/sgml htmlgit diff --checkThe SGML and HTML checks were run in an out-of-tree cumulative documentation build containing this change and the other independently proposed documentation additions.
AI assistance disclosure
This contribution was prepared with OpenAI Codex using GPT-5. The agent assisted with source and test inspection, issue scoping, drafting code, documentation and tests where applicable, running verification, and preparing the PR description. I directed the scope, reviewed the resulting changes against the source and test results, and remain responsible for the submission.