Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 6, 2023. It is now read-only.

Create ruleset: Elgas.com.au#15772

Merged
J0WI merged 3 commits intoEFForg:masterfrom
injust:patch-217
Jun 28, 2018
Merged

Create ruleset: Elgas.com.au#15772
J0WI merged 3 commits intoEFForg:masterfrom
injust:patch-217

Conversation

@injust
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@injust injust commented Jun 16, 2018

No description provided.

@Hainish Hainish added the top-1m label Jun 16, 2018
<ruleset name="Elgas.com.au">
<target host="elgas.com.au" />
<target host="www.elgas.com.au" />
<target host="emap.elgas.com.au" />
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

secure.elgas.com.au

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That host fails the CI build, because accessing it on HTTP redirects to www.secure.elgas.com.au, which DNE.
Maybe the Travis tests should be modified to allow for sites that only work on HTTPS?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@J0WI J0WI Jun 17, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The problem here is that HTTP serves a different response than HTTPS. Could you document the issue?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've added a comment for secure.elgas.com.au.
In this case, would it be better to leave the target out of the ruleset, or include it and whitelist the ruleset against fetch tests?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know what the expected behavior would be in this case. I'm fine with both variants.

@J0WI J0WI merged commit c5d7c69 into EFForg:master Jun 28, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants