One other case with before eaches!
A given-when-then-style test:
suite(function() {
describe("given", function() {
a = [];
beforeEach(function() {
array_push(a, 1);
});
describe("when", function() {
beforeEach(function() {
array_push(a, 2);
});
it("then", function() {
expect(a).toBeEqual([1, 2])
});
});
});
});── given
└── when
├── ❌ then (0.12ms)
│ ├── On file "Script1" (line 41):
│ ├── > expect([ 2 ]).toBeEqual([ 1,2 ]):
│ ├── - Expected Result: [ 1,2 ]
│ └── - Received Result: [ 2 ]
Here's the jest equivalent:
describe('given', function () {
let a = [];
beforeEach(function () {
a.push(1);
});
describe('when', function () {
beforeEach(function () {
a.push(2);
});
it('then', function () {
expect(a).toStrictEqual([1, 2]);
});
});
});Might be best as a separate issue but sharing variables between these function calls would also be great! vitest (a jest-like test framework) actually passes a context object which is unique per test so variables can be shared across these code blocks like this:
import { describe, beforeEach, it, expect } from "vitest";
describe("given a new array a", function() {
beforeEach(function(context) {
context.a = [];
});
describe("when 1 is added to a", function() {
beforeEach(function(context) {
context.a.push(1);
});
it("then array a is [1]", function(context) {
expect(context.a).toStrictEqual([1])
});
});
});
One other case with before eaches!
A given-when-then-style test:
Here's the jest equivalent:
Might be best as a separate issue but sharing variables between these function calls would also be great! vitest (a jest-like test framework) actually passes a context object which is unique per test so variables can be shared across these code blocks like this: