fix(github): pin cache action revision - #3
seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughOpenCode GitHub Action의 Changes캐시 액션 참조 고정
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Change: Bug fix Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The cache dependency is pinned and regression coverage is reported. No actionable code-level merge risk is established; the reported hosted checks remain pending. Security Architecture ReviewSecurity architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to The change reduces dependency-substitution risk without changing the action’s inputs, cache configuration, or execution sequence. No introduced security concern was established. The selected upstream implementation and consumer-specific permissions were not independently assessed. Retained concerns Security review detailsSecurity Blast Radius
Trust Boundaries and Controls
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 1 functions across 1 files. (4 skipped: 4 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1📝 Generate docstrings 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Thanks for your contribution! This PR doesn't have a linked issue. All PRs must reference an existing issue. Please:
See CONTRIBUTING.md for details. |
|
Exact-head repair evidence for
|
|
@coderabbitai review Please review exact head |
|
Thanks for updating your PR! It now meets our contributing guidelines. 👍 |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
Current authority — stacked prerequisite admission correctionExact head Fresh exact-head evidence before this state correction:
Therefore the unready mutable prerequisite is a valid Draft reason under the current concurrency authority. This exact head is converted Ready → Draft once in this run. No source ref, head SHA, base, check run, rerun, cancellation, or wake generation is changed. Return to Ready only after #2 becomes an immutable integrated prerequisite or an exact-head authority record proves the prerequisite is no longer mutable/unready. |
Issue for this PR
Blocked: repository Issues are disabled. The issue creation API returned HTTP 410, so a canonical issue cannot currently be linked. The originating exact evidence is OpenCode PR #2 SAST run
36848110084, job110323025333, ruleyaml.github-actions.security.github-actions-mutable-action-tag.github-actions-mutable-action-tagatgithub/action.yml:53.Type of change
What does this PR do?
The published composite action executed mutable
actions/cache@v4in every consumer runner. This PR pins the official v4.3.0 commit0057852bfaa89a56745cba8c7296529d2fc39830, adds a structural production-file contract, and records the RCA in CHANGELOG, doctoring, anddocs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md.Two independently found oracle misses are retained as executable fixtures:
Actions/Cacheandactions/cache/{restore,save}edges are classified as the same repository.The test parses
runs.steps[*].useswithBun.YAML.parse, canonicalizes repository case, and covers same-repository sub-actions. No scanner suppression, copied workflow, or consumer workaround is introduced.How did you verify your code works?
9d05f4f11fbd48cd909e5355591a66563010ff12; current headc15dabc57a495ecb5e324b7ae4fe50c255212ab9; GitHub reports mergeable.packages/opencode: 6 passed, 0 failed, 7 assertions.36853164446exists at the exact head, but all four jobs remain queued and are not claimed GREEN.Screenshots / recordings
Not applicable; this is a GitHub Action supply-chain repair with no UI change.
Checklist
Ownership and stack
This OpenCode-owned source repair is stacked on #2 (
apk-cache-cleanup) without copying or dropping its delta. The five-file change is two ordinary commits ahead of the exact base and zero behind.Merge state
Draft / Proposed / merge HOLD. The bounded source delta is reviewable, but exact base #2 is a mutable Draft prerequisite with substantive exact-head SAST/Trivy failures and queued product jobs. That unready prerequisite is the Draft reason; queued Checks and missing approval alone are not. Fresh exact-head Checks, repair or equivalent exact-revision evidence for the stacked-base workflow coverage Gap, and an independent APPROVED review remain required before ordinary merge. Queued, skipped, missing, and status-only results are not passing evidence.
Summary by CodeRabbit