Message 95051 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	isandler
Recipients	alexandre.vassalotti, draghuram, gvanrossum, isandler, stephbul
Date	2009-11-09.01:22:01
SpamBayes Score	5.2061464e-06
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Is not this patch backward incompatible? E.g any cmd-based application which expects Ctrl-C to propagate to the top level will be broken by this patch. As for pdb, I don't think pdb will benefit from this patch: as I believe that pdb needs something along the lines of patch #7245 for Ctrl-C (temporary interrupt of execution with ability to resume similar to what gdb does)

Is not this patch backward incompatible?

E.g any cmd-based application which expects Ctrl-C to propagate to the
top level will be broken by this patch.

As for pdb, I don't think pdb will benefit from this patch: as I believe
that pdb needs something along the lines of patch #7245 for Ctrl-C
(temporary interrupt of execution with ability to resume similar to what
gdb does)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-11-09 01:22:05	isandler	set	recipients: + isandler, gvanrossum, draghuram, alexandre.vassalotti, stephbul
2009-11-09 01:22:04	isandler	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2009-11-09 01:22:03	isandler	link	issue1294 messages
2009-11-09 01:22:01	isandler	create